The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:
"If the paper from every morning edition of the nation's largest newspaper were collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, about 5 million trees would be saved each year. This kind of recycling is unnecessary, however, since the newspaper maintains its own forests to ensure an uninterrupted supply of paper."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Write the essay now!
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-07-25 | ShivaniPatel | view |
- The following appeared as part of a memorandum from the vice president of Nostrum, a large pharmaceutical corporation:"The proposal to increase the health and retirement benefits that our employees r
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the publisher to the staff of The Clarion, a large metropolitan newspaper:"During the recent campaign for mayor, a clear majority of city readers who respo 100
- The following appeared in a speech delivered by a member of the city council:"Twenty years ago, only half of the students who graduated from Einstein High School went on to attend a college or univer
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the human resources department of Diversified Manufacturing:"Managers at our central office report that their employees tend to be most productive in the d 100
- The following appeared as part of a company memorandum:"Adopting an official code of ethics regarding business practices may in the long run do our company more harm than good in the public eye. When