؟؟؟
Although the prime reason of the television managers to increase the time of national news during the late-night news program and lessing the times pertained to weather and local new is ambiguous, the bussiness manager statement does not sound logically for a couple of evidences which are neglected in his speculations.
The author conclusion from the apparantly evidence of increasing complaining viewer decide change the TV schedule to formerly is insufficent. There is no enough evidence to show this recieved complaints are from the real obserervers who are really wanting effective TV programs. Moreover, not only it is vague that these complaint are from vertable viewer, but also we dont know the real statistics relied behind this complaint. It is probable that a person make a complaint more than one time. Even, if all of the complains are recieved from different abservers, how can we make sure they are a statistically sufficient number complaints to conclude a change in the prime decide?
Additionally, There is not any obvious relationship between the recent revoking of bussiness advertisements and the decreased enthusiasm among viewrs . There should be some evidences which shows the bussiness companies main reason to cancel their advertisement. For instance, probably they want to make new advertisement which are tailored to the newe format of the late-night new. Also how can this manager assure him or herself that there is not any other advertising choices? There are a couple of national companies, which instead of the local companies might avidly want to advertise their products in TV last-night news.
Las but not least, what are the proofs which accertain this manager that by reforming the late-night news to the former format the viewers and the advertisement would come back again? what if by doing so the increasing complaints and decreasing advertisement would continue?
However, it might be o wrongheaded idea to change the last format of the late-night news, the author of this memorandum is strongly misconcluding from some insufficint apparantly proofs to rearrange the prorgram formation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-10 | shayandj70 | 44 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s speculations. The author conclusion from the apparantly evidence of increasi...
^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...aints are from the real obserervers who are really wanting effective TV programs. Moreover, not on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this complaint' or 'these complaints'?
Suggestion: this complaint; these complaints
...ms. Moreover, not only it is vague that these complaint are from vertable viewer, but also we d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t are from vertable viewer, but also we dont know the real statistics relied behind ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... complaint more than one time. Even, if all of the complains are recieved from different a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd the decreased enthusiasm among viewrs . There should be some evidences which sh...
^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... the newe format of the late-night new. Also how can this manager assure him or hers...
^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...he advertisement would come back again? what if by doing so the increasing complaint...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 337.0 441.139720559 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35608308605 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00098748964 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545994065282 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5502117903 57.8364921388 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.70786347227 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.218282227539 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0743258471296 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.128457276422 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.