70. The following appeared in a memo from a vice
president of a large, highly diversified company.
In this memo, the vice present expresses that company should use construction Z rather than A for the upcoming building project. However, there are a number of evidences are needed to evaluate if the recommendation is reasonable.
To begin with, the higher construction cost of Z compared with A is not a garantee of better quality. It is possible the average cost in the region where used Z is much more expensive than the region where used A. Besides, the maintain cost of Z which is half of A cannot ever be substantial element, more evidence should be provided why the cost is less, it may be the reason that the company constructed by z didn't pay much attention on maintenance as a, consequently didn't spend as much money as a. But low attention on maintenance could bring more potential problems in the future.
Moreover, it also argues that the energy consumption of z is lower than that of A building every year. As we know, the utility fee of different region may varies significantly. It is possible that the utility cost of Z of same usage is certainly lower than that of A. We need evidence of the utility fee data of these two regions, which may strengthen or waken the argument.
In order to analyze which construction plan is more lucrative, we need reconsider meticulously. First, we need to know if the staff of the two construction companies are the same as last year, because the quality is influenced formidably by the works of various staff. Second, the reason why A charges less than Z is also essential for determination.
To sum up, based on above evidence are not provided, it is not prudent to decide to use any of the two construction plans. Only know the detailed background, could we make better decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... than the region where used A. Besides, the maintain cost of Z which is half of A cannot eve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...eason that the company constructed by z didnt pay much attention on maintenance as a,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...nt pay much attention on maintenance as a, consequently didnt spend as much money ...
^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ntion on maintenance as a, consequently didnt spend as much money as a. But low atten...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: THE_SENT_END[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...nsequently didnt spend as much money as a. But low attention on maintenance could ...
^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A charge' or simply 'charges'?
Suggestion: A charge; Charges
... various staff. Second, the reason why A charges less than Z is also essential for deter...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 306.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71568627451 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89182450732 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4096683192 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.70786347227 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00800698769178 0.218282227539 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00287399916532 0.0743258471296 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0107535202065 0.0701772020484 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00708113863191 0.128457276422 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141622772638 0.0628817314937 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.3799401198 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.5979740519 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.