"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
Given argument is not necessarily true because author reaches at the conclusion by only considering one point(peoples lack of awareness). The Author is asserting that Public's lack of awareness is the reason behind fewer people attended Super screen produced movies on the basis of one point which is that the percentage of positive reviews is increased than last year.Here the author is ignoring many things which may be responsible for fewer people attending movies.
Firstly, author assumes that Reviews given by movie reviewers are genuine, and they can be considered firm reason in deciding movies qualities. Which may not be true because there is a possibility that reviewer is actually biased towards movie because of favourite actress, actor or maybe author like songs in the movies.
Secondly, there is a possibility that along with Super Screen produced movies there is concomitantly another movies of superstar actor is screening, thats why people are interested in watching their superstar movies.
There are many more reasons possible for fewer attendance for Super Screen movies like this year leaked copies of movies are easily available for movies or people does not like to much detailed provided by film, may be they only need is entertainment not a complex concept.
Conclusion of this argument is that author ignored many other factors may be possible for reduction in attendance to movies. Author claiming that lack of awareness of reviews isthr only reason behind the decrease in attendance which show authors lack of consideration of other factors and too much belief on reviewrs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Cynic | 43 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | nimesh94 | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | mcmaster | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | a251ravind | 63 | view |
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movi 23
- Best way for a society to prepares its young people for leadership in government, industries and other fields is by instilling in them a sence of cooperation, not competition. 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 257 350
No. of Characters: 1327 1500
No. of Different Words: 132 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.004 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.163 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.613 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.973 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.475 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.806 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.166 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Here
...ive reviews is increased than last year.Here the author is ignoring many things whic...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble for fewer people attending movies. Firstly, author assumes that Reviews giv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...maybe author like songs in the movies. Secondly, there is a possibility that al...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...movies of superstar actor is screening, thats why people are interested in watching t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in watching their superstar movies. There are many more reasons possible for...
^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...able for movies or people does not like to much detailed provided by film, may be ...
^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...like to much detailed provided by film, may be they only need is entertainment not a c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s entertainment not a complex concept. Conclusion of this argument is that auth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 2260.96107784 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 441.139720559 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26953125 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67253452661 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 204.123752495 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4921875 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1322156271 57.8364921388 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.625 119.503703932 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 23.324526521 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.70786347227 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310906271988 0.218282227539 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143657772187 0.0743258471296 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103536519746 0.0701772020484 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188948016099 0.128457276422 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651252279815 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 14.3799401198 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.3550499002 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.197005988 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.