According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
The aforementioned argument is flawed for numerous reasons. The possibilty of attractiing public through increased budget, claim of good quality movie from movie production company and increment of positive reviews fail to justify the argument.
The argument fails to justify that though fewer people attended super-screen produced movies, the percentage of positive review increased during past year for all of these movies. Only for a specific movies, the reviewers gave a positive feedback not for all the movies of super screen production company. Therefore, increased postive review is not about all the movies. The argument can not justify the assumed cause of increased positive review.
The argument also have shortcomings to prove that their movie quality is very high but the public lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. May be to the public do not think about the super screen movie production company's movies as good quality. So, the argument fails in this case.If super screen movie production company could particularly show that their movie is of very good quality, then the argument would stand true.
Also, allocating a great share of budget next year to reaching public through advertisement is not at all warranted. The production company are advertising but the people are attracted to other movie production companies. In that case, the argument falls apart. If Super screen movie production company is the only movie production company, then it can justify the argument.
In a nutshell, the given argument fails to justify the quality of their movie, cause of increased positive review and increased budget result. For all these cases, the validity of the argument falls apart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | Venkateshwar | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Venkateshwar | 23 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Smrithi B R | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | sampath srini | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | harshalg007 | 42 | view |
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 43
- "The Fern County Council made the right decision when it unanimously voted to convert the Northside branch of the county library system into a computer-skills training facility for public use. The converted facility will fill what is certain, based on nat 82
- The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres."Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards shoul 59
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The possibilty of attractiing public through increased budget, claim of good quality movie from movie production company and increment of positive reviews fail to justify the argument.
Error: possibilty Suggestion: possibility
Error: attractiing Suggestion: attracting
Sentence: The argument fails to justify that though fewer people attended super-screen produced movies, the percentage of positive review increased during past year for all of these movies.
Error: super-screen Suggestion: super screen
Sentence: Therefore, increased postive review is not about all the movies.
Error: postive Suggestion: positive
---------------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 274 350
No. of Characters: 1419 1500
No. of Different Words: 116 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.069 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.179 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.594 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.307 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.467 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.423 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.64 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eviews fail to justify the argument. The argument fails to justify that though f...
^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'movie'?
Suggestion: movie
...ll of these movies. Only for a specific movies, the reviewers gave a positive feedback...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...vies of good quality are available. May be to the public do not think about the su...
^^
Line 6, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...ty. So, the argument fails in this case.If super screen movie production company c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 273.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36263736264 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64849603668 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446886446886 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8472827257 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.70786347227 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335834920944 0.218282227539 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128524908532 0.0743258471296 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100043597603 0.0701772020484 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193075844426 0.128457276422 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948832520876 0.0628817314937 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 98.500998004 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.