In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvements project that Bulter County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Bulter County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The writer of the argument, based on the mentioned report, recommends that if Prunty County instead of lowering the speed limit, executes the same kind of road improvements project as Bulter County, the number of accidents in the country highways will decrease. However, this recommendation cannot be accepted as it is because it relies on a series of assumptions for the support of which there is no convincing evidence.
First of all, the writer refers to a report but did not indicate that how many highways were studied in the sample used. As we know, the larger the size of the sample, the more reliable and valid the findings are. Maybe in this report, only three or four highways in the country were examined. As a result it may not be representative of the exact status in the country highways. It follows that the findings of such a study is neither reliable or valid.
Secondly, a threshold assumption upon which the recommendation stands is that the writer assumed that highways in both countries are exactly similar in terms of lane widths, number of lanes, visibility, traffic, etc. we need to know whether the aforesaid parameters are the same in both places to jump such a recommendation. There is no evidence in the argument to prove that these road improvements projects accomplished in Prunty County would bring the same results in Bulter County so the recommendation is not persuasive as it does not pass in the analogy between Bulter County and Prunty County.
Thirdly, even if we assume that the above weaknesses are removed, there is another problem with the recommendation. The writer assumes that the decrease in accidents is solely due to the road improvements projects. However, there is no evidence in the argument to support this assertion. Perhaps some external parameters impacted the results. Maybe during this past 5 years the cars’ safety were improved due to efforts of car industry managers or new engineering and technologies. Or maybe people drive more carefully as a result of a safety instructive program which the government carried out in TV for example. Consequently, this recommendation is absurd because it fails to consider other probable concatenation of circumstances.
In the final analysis, the writer recommends the aforementioned road improvement project to decrease accident rate in Prunty County. However, the writer falls short to give any substantiate evidence to support the recommendation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-18 | sapana | 33 | view |
2019-12-14 | yswang | 34 | view |
2019-11-28 | angeshpokharel | 55 | view |
2019-11-19 | bishal sitaula | 53 | view |
2019-11-17 | smithsonite79 | 63 | view |
- A foreign visitor has only one day to spend in your country. Where should this visitor go on the day? Why? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 80
- TPO 21 taks 2 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate with other people is more important than studying hard in school 97
- People rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a respond in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 60
- The solution to most problems that societies confront is a higher level of political sophistication that results from more education When people have the facts about the issues they will be clearer thinkers and better citizens Most people depend on broadc 95
- TPO 16 – taks 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is to travel in a group led by a tour guide. 80
argument 1 -- not really. how many samples do you think are valid?
suggested: here the time of taking the observation of number accidents is not mentioned. It would have been possible that report have been made just after applying the restriction on limit and by that time the policy was not completely effective
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 399 350
No. of Characters: 2005 1500
No. of Different Words: 194 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.469 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.025 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.935 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.978 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.307 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.531 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5