The following appeared in an email from the president of CheapSteak Foods.
Six months ago, we opened our first restaurant, CheapSteak which sells quickly-prepared and low-priced sandwhiches fro nearby restaurents away from expensive. Although many of these restaurants tried to compete by lowering there prices and there drive thru-services,Given our success we believe it is open other cheapsteak restaurant and launch a frozen food line.
The author concludes that after opening the first restaurant as CheapSteak which sells steak sandwiches at low prices, The Waitstaff has conducted a survey and reported that the low-cost and convenience drew many customers who are great fond of the steak sandwiches. And the author opens another CheapSteak restaurant and launch a frozen food line on the basis of success of first restaurant. But this argument is rife with holes and assumptions, thus assumptions not strong enough to open second restaurant.
First of all, the argument assumes that steak sandwiches at low cost and the quick-serve make the restaurant a success which results in reduction of many customers from the other nearby restaurants. The survey consists of major flaws as it is based on nearby surveys not on the basis of all surveys. In the survey they also not mentioned about the steak sandwiches who providing steak sandwiches as it is the main menu of CheapSteak restaurant. To fix these flaw the survey should be on basis of all restaurant and especially for the restaurant who serves steak sandwiches.
Secondly, the author is laying emphasis on opening another restaurant and launch a frozen food line which is completely different concept of first restaurant. The author’s view on opening another restaurant is not dependent on the given premise as they are selling steak sandwiches and it’s a completely different thing. The author should collect more information regarding opening of second restaurant on new theme.
Examining all the possible consequence, angles and factors involved with restaurant, I believe that argument would vastly improve on the survey which was done by WaitStaff whether they have taken all the restaurant who served Steak Restaurant in count or not. And the author should get a clear picture about the restaurant who works on theme of a frozen food line. In this way, I conclude that these suggestion will be aggregated to the assumptions
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-08 | kanishkbar4321@gmail.com | 63 | view |
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerne 45
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 23
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
minimum 3 arguments wanted.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 318 350
No. of Characters: 1612 1500
No. of Different Words: 148 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.223 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.069 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.736 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.462 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.59 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.431 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.621 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.136 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this suggestion' or 'these suggestions'?
Suggestion: this suggestion; these suggestions
...food line. In this way, I conclude that these suggestion will be aggregated to the assumptions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 318.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19182389937 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84108489483 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468553459119 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2744870244 57.8364921388 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202529847175 0.218282227539 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814117257651 0.0743258471296 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550749460245 0.0701772020484 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134995646902 0.128457276422 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528960201792 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.