The magazine published in Corpora concerns itself with a very crucial as well as common factor in people's life that is health. The magazine has depicted an opinion formed by medical experts regarding some analysis of the population of the people of Corpora. However, the argument appears to lack evidence and is totally absurd.
Firstly, the article itself presents a self contradictory statement about the adequate standards of physical health. The experts said that half of Corpora's population met the then standards of physical fitness which may have changed further. So examining both the reports based on different standards is completely ludicrous. Further, the experts opinion that spending time on computers has led to the decline has been proved false without a justified report on the same.
The magazine states that fitness level are high in the region where even the levels of computer ownership are the highest. However, there might be the possibility that the people who owns computer in Corpora do not even use it and are highly concerned about there health and fitness making the overall fitness level of the region higher.
The magazine extrapolates that an unusually low expenditures on fitness related products have led to the decline in economy. The magazine lacks data to support this claim. There might be the possibility that people are becoming frugal for survival in the rising inflation or else there might be the chance that fitness related products lately are not meeting the public demands.
However, relying on the myth that increase in economy with improve the fitness level is obscure and the article in the magazine lacks supporting data for the claim.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 274 350
No. of Characters: 1392 1500
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.069 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.08 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.478 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.185 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.353 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.633 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...s is completely ludicrous. Further, the experts opinion that spending time on computers...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 274.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19708029197 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51907317492 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 204.123752495 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0042447231 57.8364921388 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.70786347227 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0705183693263 0.218282227539 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283218361807 0.0743258471296 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207747031649 0.0701772020484 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0396420494475 0.128457276422 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172867630338 0.0628817314937 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.