According to a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, it is stated that they should decrease operating expenses at Movies Galore in order to augment their profitability. This conclusion is based on several arguments including these methods increasing business efficiency in Marston and their company which is well-known for special bargains instead of raising rental costs. Before this recommendation is properly evaluated, some queries should be elucidated.
First of all, are Movies Galore and Marston roughly comparable? It is quite easy to differentiate the distinct characteristics between both places. Therefore, it is quite difficult to generalize and predict similarities. For example, stores at Marston could gain success because they are in central areas, while branches at Marston can be rural areas. If either has merit, the argument drawn in the original conclusion could be significantly hampered.
Secondly, is there a strong association between reducing operating time and eliminating all obsolete movies and increasing revenue? It can be temporary situation, thus there can be various reasons causing more profits in stories in Marston. For example, the improvement of standard of living or the high density of population in this place could result in this case. If the above is true, the argument do not hold water.
Finally, the company, well-known in special bargains, does not mean that raising the rental prices could not increase the profits. Because the revenue can come from various resources, and there are many ways to attract customers to contribute to improving profits. Indeed, this reason can damage substantially the credibility of the argument.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is flawed due to its reliance on myriad of unwarranted assumptions. If the author could resolve these questions and offer more evidence, it will be possible to fully evaluate the proposed recommendation to cut off operating expenses of stores at Movies Galore.
- The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis In Megalopolis the number of law school graduates who went to work for large corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years whereas an increasing nu 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 87
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of movie rental stores quot In order to stop the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore 039 s ten movie rental stores Since we ar 50
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 308.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48051948052 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97847452695 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.468620217663 126% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2881857904 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2941176471 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198367307168 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577626077813 0.0743258471296 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928749983104 0.0701772020484 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108018611811 0.128457276422 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587385199645 0.0628817314937 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.3799401198 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 308.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48051948052 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97847452695 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.468620217663 126% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2881857904 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2941176471 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198367307168 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577626077813 0.0743258471296 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928749983104 0.0701772020484 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108018611811 0.128457276422 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587385199645 0.0628817314937 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.3799401198 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.