The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council.
"Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the past two years, however, the town's residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in previous years. Next month the amount of recycled material—which includes paper, plastic, and metal—should further increase, since charges for pickup of other household garbage will double. Furthermore, over 90 percent of the respondents to a recent survey said that they would do more recycling in the future. Because of our town's strong commitment to recycling, the available space in our landfill should last for considerably longer than predicted."
The argument presented that the West Egg's landfill would last for a more period of time then the initially predicted is fallacious because it makes certain crucial assumptions without any concrete evidence or facts and based on the assumption we can definitely confirm whether the given statement is true, event such as that the amount of the recycling material will double on the assumption of the pick up chargers .
firstly we must understand that the consultant which predicted the timeline of the landfill these are not any government authorised agency. any data is not clearly mentioned about them so they could favour various different agency such as the cleaning agency which would be eventually be hired to separate the recycling dump and hazard dump and so on .its been also mentioned that the resident has shown response and they have recycled twice the number of garbage they did in previous years but this data could be fallacious as there are no mentions to the source of the information .
futhermore in way is good to our that people become aware of there responsibility in terms of garbage disposal and help civics of the society but over here there is a percentage statics which says some over 90 per cent in a survey would do recycling and on this assumption more assumption was made without question about the respondent the surveyor or the number of respondents to which the statics was based . it is worth exploring it can a case where only 10 people for surveyed for a city population on this basis the number was reported or could be the case were the surveyor and their teams and they themselves became respondents and played the role of the citizen and bases on this drafted the report.
lastly whatever might be the case we must understand is a high time where we must responsibility for our actions and stop treating our mother earth like landfills which someday will eventually become full if we don't stop treating her this way.
To conclude the assumption that the landfills will last more than the amount of time predicted is logical in convincing due to numerous assumption made in the argument and without considering the source or the credibility of the agency involved in making this decision and the surveys and so the whole argument is in convincing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | noel11051105 | 34 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 50 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | swappy1996 | 23 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. Duri 23
- 43 The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the 23
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 393 350
No. of Characters: 1881 1500
No. of Different Words: 193 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.452 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.786 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.626 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 56.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 24.544 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.45 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.83 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.135 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...est Eggs landfill would last for a more period of time then the initially predicted is fallaci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n the assumption of the pick up chargers . firstly we must understand that the ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...assumption of the pick up chargers . firstly we must understand that the consultant ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Any
...e not any government authorised agency. any data is not clearly mentioned about the...
^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...recycling dump and hazard dump and so on .its been also mentioned that the residen...
^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...entions to the source of the information . futhermore in way is good to our tha...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Futhermore
...s to the source of the information . futhermore in way is good to our that people becom...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...spondents to which the statics was based . it is worth exploring it can a case whe...
^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ndents to which the statics was based . it is worth exploring it can a case where ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...nd bases on this drafted the report. lastly whatever might be the case we must unde...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...meday will eventually become full if we dont stop treating her this way. To concl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 392.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86479591837 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63821763258 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494897959184 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 56.0 22.8473053892 245% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.432193094 57.8364921388 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 272.428571429 119.503703932 228% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 56.0 23.324526521 240% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111362195735 0.218282227539 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530131403085 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241699844755 0.0701772020484 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580869201664 0.128457276422 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03032562614 0.0628817314937 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.5 14.3799401198 205% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 23.1 48.3550499002 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 12.197005988 197% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 24.4 11.1389221557 219% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.9071856287 202% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.