The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”
The assumption of this newspaper editorial states that is that the self sufficiency of a nation relies on its ability to keep out illegal immigrants. It further supposes that its economy and national identity are linked to the indeterminate number of illegal residents and therefore they should be return to where they came from. There is no basis for this correlation.
A strong national identity can hardly challenged by immigration legal or otherwise. Many first world powers, like the United States, Great Britain, Germany, have large immigrant workforces and very strong national pride. The power position of an illegal immigrant is not one they can boast about so they must lay low to survive. How then could they threaten or challenge country's self-image?
It has been shown that immigrate stake the jobs that are not filled by the existing labor force. Service industries jobs in the janitorial arts, food sector and manual labor are often fulfilled by immigrants will to work for less wages and tougher labor conditions. The lower cost of labor so they do not pose a threat but rather contribute economically to a country's power. This power enhances national identity.
Returning immigrants to their place of origin is an impractical idea. If a country cannot figure out who has come in, how can they send those people back? The resources needed to figure this out would be better spent on examine the pull factor for such people to cross boarders.
In sum, the editorial's recommendation to return immigrants to their point of origin can be support by them being a threat as no substantial evidence of such is presented. It also fails to adequately make the cast that strong borders are what make a country autonomous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | nikki1610 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Mat Pro | 69 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | bishal sitaula | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Roshan Dhakal | 59 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | man_si_jain | 72 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'returned'?
Suggestion: returned
... residents and therefore they should be return to where they came from. There is no b...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere is no basis for this correlation. A strong national identity can hardly ch...
^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'challenge'
Suggestion: challenge
... A strong national identity can hardly challenged by immigration legal or otherwise. Man...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kforces and very strong national pride. The power position of an illegal immigra...
^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: LAY_AROUND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lie low'?
Suggestion: lie low
...t one they can boast about so they must lay low to survive. How then could they threat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun wages is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ulfilled by immigrants will to work for less wages and tougher labor conditions. The...
^^^^
Line 10, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'editorials'' or 'editorial's'?
Suggestion: editorials'; editorial's
...ople to cross boarders. In sum, the editorials recommendation to return immigrants to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 289.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0276816609 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69925914431 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 204.123752495 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.468620217663 131% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.471057884232 425% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2398832098 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8125 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5625 5.70786347227 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193888643027 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588350408153 0.0743258471296 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430955807241 0.0701772020484 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102487557259 0.128457276422 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484580938805 0.0628817314937 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.