The letter predicts that omitting non resident members from city welfare committee will result in making Oak City a better place to live and work. The author seems disappointed by recent meetings of the committee. His concern seems valid that foolish objections might hinder the decision making process, thus delaying important decisions. Although his recommendation to drop non resident members of Oak City from committee is based on arguments that are flawed.
To begin with, instead of omitting author could have suggested replacing such members who hinder the advise committee's process of taking decisions. People from different places have different perspectives. This helps in bringing in new and generalized ideas. It is important for council to consider problems of each group, independent of whether they live or only commute to work from neighboring cities. Complete removal of non residents might blind the committee on problems that commuters face. Having a good mix of people from all classes of society will only help in making the city a better place. We cant ignore the fact that only author might think that objections raised by such members were non-intellectual. There is no evidence that full committee agrees to such statement.
Moreover, people who are residents of neighboring cities may not have complete understanding of how the politics and business work in Oak City. But they can provide a valuable insight on how politics and business work in their city. This will only help having more choice for making decisions. Adapting from tested and well implemented methods from neighboring cities to Oak City, in similar situations, will help committee save time and money. which surely would have been wasted mean while the committee reinvented the wheel. A difference in perspectives of both members resident and non-resident is artless expectation. May that's why the structure of committee has been designed so.
In addition, Oak City residents might be paying taxes but commuters bring business to city in terms of small transactions. They definitely pay for tickets, food, entertainment etc which they consume mean while they are in the city. This provides lower classes with jobs and business. However, restricting committee membership to residents only will take away the wisdom that people from different neighboring area bring. Like, the neighboring cities might be facing problems which Oak City may tend to encounter in near future.
In conclusion, the member's letter can be correct about the hindrance observed in the function of committee. But the recommendation has to stand down. Solid evidence or a vote of whole committee is missing on removal of non-residents from the committee.
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your experience. 67
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, 60
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 64
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developin 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ess, thus delaying important decisions. Although his recommendation to drop non resident...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ested replacing such members who hinder the advise committee's process of taking deci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'advice' (a noun)?
Suggestion: advice
...d replacing such members who hinder the advise committee's process of taking deci...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...p in making the city a better place. We cant ignore the fact that only author might ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... to such statement. Moreover, people who are residents of neighboring cities may not...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to have' or 'have'.
Suggestion: to have; have
...work in their city. This will only help having more choice for making decisions. Adapt...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...ill help committee save time and money. which surely would have been wasted mean whil...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ill help committee save time and money. which surely would have been wasted mean whil...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: meanwhile
...ey. which surely would have been wasted mean while the committee reinvented the wheel. A d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 199, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: meanwhile
...d, entertainment etc which they consume mean while they are in the city. This provides low...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 434.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32949308756 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83357774939 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497695852535 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4280136826 57.8364921388 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0740740741 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85185185185 5.70786347227 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254425753064 0.218282227539 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690393230576 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792548638995 0.0701772020484 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157314107499 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638552854743 0.0628817314937 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.