The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books.
"We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening the café would attract more customers. Space could be made for the café by discontinuing the children's book section, which will probably become less popular given that the most recent national census indicated a significant decline in the percentage of the population under age ten. Opening a café will allow Monarch to attract more customers and better compete with Regal Books, which recently opened its own café."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
It is unlikely that this recommendation would have a predicted result. It is true that Regal Books, which recently opened its café, is able to attract more customers since its open; the same cannot be predicted in case of Monarch Books.
The argument is clearly deficient and fails to cover many aspects about its success. First, nothing about the Regal bookstore is clear except that it has its own café. We don’t know the collection of books in both the stores. Regal stores may or may not have many genre books, hence it was not able to attract as many customers as it did after the open of the café.
Second, the author guesses that the children’s section may become less popular. This is absurd because it’s not something to be predicted. Children maybe are one of the important customers for monarch. So eliminating such a section may not bring about the desired result.
Since it's mentioned that Monarch is known for its eclectic range of books on different subjects, eliminating an entire section will affect its name.
Also the location of the bookstore is indispensable. Regal books may be in such a location where there are no eateries and so it was able to attract customers by opening its café. It cannot be same in case of Monarch. Monarch maybe located in downtown where eateries are apparent.
Hence this argument fails to provide necessary facts and hence it is unlikely to have the predicted result.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | lanhhoang | 81 | view |
2020-01-21 | stevewang1007 | 69 | view |
2020-01-20 | Anshul Agrawal | 77 | view |
2019-11-23 | kook | 59 | view |
2019-11-03 | Raunaq | 69 | view |
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...entire section will affect its name. Also the location of the bookstore is indisp...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...owntown where eateries are apparent. Hence this argument fails to provide necessar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, second, so, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 246.0 441.139720559 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91869918699 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59152000576 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7066070347 57.8364921388 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.625 119.503703932 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 23.324526521 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284965608289 0.218282227539 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909104378072 0.0743258471296 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779688419314 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145348881027 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897527821807 0.0628817314937 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.3799401198 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.3550499002 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.197005988 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 98.500998004 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.