The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our markteting department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awarness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the reccomendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The advertising director offers a strategy based on a very general observation, without providing enough data needed to understand if this strategy is actually worthwhile. To further analyze this issue, three main questions must be answered.
Firstly, the advertising director stated that fewer people attended Super Screen-produced films than in any other year, but he did not state if the overall market share of Super Screen films decreased. Therefore, I would first ask if there was a change in Super Screen's viewership market share during the past year? This is crucial in order to understand if Super Screen has fell back as opposed to it's competition, or whether the movie industry as a whole is suffering from a decrease in viewership. In the first case, the advertiesment director's reccomendations might be relavent, since the decrease was only seen in Super Screen viewership, but in the second it would seem that the decrease is due to a much graiver problem than reaching out to the public, as the advertisment director suggests.
Secondly, the advertisment director has presupposed that his department lacks funds, and therefore was less efficent than in previous years. In order to analyze if this is in fact true, the advertisment budget during the past year must be compared to previous budgets, and it must be determined whether a derease in advertisment costs occured. If a signifcant decrease did in fact occur, and in every year such a decrease occured a cocurrent decrease in viewership can be seen, then the director's suggestion might be beneficial since a corrolation between viewership and advertisment budget can be seen. In any other case, it cannot be expected that a raise in the advertisment budget would surely result in an increase in viewership.
Lastly, the director suggests that positive reviews must mean that a film is attractive to the audience and that people would be willing to see the positively reviewed film. In reality, it seems the exact opposite might be the case. Most box office hits are known to recieve generally negative review from critics, while the movies with critical praise usually suffer from low interest amongst the audience. Hence, the director's assumption that if viewers were aware of Super Screen's films' positive reviews they would be more interested in seeing them must be examined. I would ask whether in previous years, both amongst Super Screen films and other films, a connection can be seen between viewership rates and positive reviews. Only if a positive connection exists, might the director's suggestion be benficial. In any other case, it would seem that positive reviews do not in fact promise high quality film's that attract many viewers, and thus the director's assumption that the decrease in viewership has nothing to do with the films' quality would be wrong.
In conclusion, many questions must be answered before we would be able to determine whether the director's proposition is reasonable and based on sufficent arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | YO | 37 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Daffodilia | 59 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | kook | 40 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | sefeliz | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | farhadmoqimi | 58 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our markteting department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 49
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 54
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: In the first case, the advertiesment director's reccomendations might be relavent, since the decrease was only seen in Super Screen viewership, but in the second it would seem that the decrease is due to a much graiver problem than reaching out to the public, as the advertisment director suggests.
Error: graiver Suggestion: graver
Error: advertiesment Suggestion: advertisement
Error: advertisment Suggestion: advertisement
Error: viewership Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: relavent Suggestion: relent
Error: reccomendations Suggestion: recommendations
Sentence: Secondly, the advertisment director has presupposed that his department lacks funds, and therefore was less efficent than in previous years.
Error: efficent Suggestion: efficient
Error: advertisment Suggestion: advertisement
Sentence: In order to analyze if this is in fact true, the advertisment budget during the past year must be compared to previous budgets, and it must be determined whether a derease in advertisment costs occured.
Error: advertisment Suggestion: advertisement
Error: occured Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: derease Suggestion: decease
Sentence: If a signifcant decrease did in fact occur, and in every year such a decrease occured a cocurrent decrease in viewership can be seen, then the director's suggestion might be beneficial since a corrolation between viewership and advertisment budget can be seen.
Error: cocurrent Suggestion: concurrent
Error: advertisment Suggestion: advertisement
Error: occured Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: viewership Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: signifcant Suggestion: significant
Error: corrolation Suggestion: correlation
Sentence: In any other case, it cannot be expected that a raise in the advertisment budget would surely result in an increase in viewership.
Error: advertisment Suggestion: advertisement
Error: viewership Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Most box office hits are known to recieve generally negative review from critics, while the movies with critical praise usually suffer from low interest amongst the audience.
Error: recieve Suggestion: receive
Sentence: I would ask whether in previous years, both amongst Super Screen films and other films, a connection can be seen between viewership rates and positive reviews.
Error: viewership Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Only if a positive connection exists, might the director's suggestion be benficial.
Error: benficial Suggestion: beneficial
Sentence: In any other case, it would seem that positive reviews do not in fact promise high quality film's that attract many viewers, and thus the director's assumption that the decrease in viewership has nothing to do with the films' quality would be wrong.
Error: viewership Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: In conclusion, many questions must be answered before we would be able to determine whether the director's proposition is reasonable and based on sufficent arguments.
Error: sufficent Suggestion: sufficient
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 15 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 489 350
No. of Characters: 2478 1500
No. of Different Words: 223 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.702 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.067 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.796 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 179 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 146 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 107 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.42 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.56 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'directors'' or 'director's'?
Suggestion: directors'; director's
...ase in viewership can be seen, then the directors suggestion might be beneficial since a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'directors'' or 'director's'?
Suggestion: directors'; director's
...terest amongst the audience. Hence, the directors assumption that if viewers were aware o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 779, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'directors'' or 'director's'?
Suggestion: directors'; director's
...a positive connection exists, might the directors suggestion be benficial. In any other c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 951, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'directors'' or 'director's'?
Suggestion: directors'; director's
...that attract many viewers, and thus the directors assumption that the decrease in viewers...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.9520958084 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2537.0 2260.96107784 112% => OK
No of words: 489.0 441.139720559 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1881390593 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84376545764 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 204.123752495 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474437627812 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 705.55239521 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.67365269461 418% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.543620985 57.8364921388 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.944444444 119.503703932 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209137073029 0.218282227539 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765335097375 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736338714447 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114366762788 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117647972924 0.0628817314937 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.