The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The given memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company tells us about his or her plan to increase the viewership of their movies by advertising. The director is telling that the increase in percentage of positive votes is an indicator of a good quality of movie and the reason for less number of people attending the movie is the dearth of publicity of the movie. While the director's argument may be tempting but there are certain flaws and scarcity of the information which makes his or her argument a fallacious only. Hence, the director's claim is not strong enough to be credulous for us.
Firstly, the director is apprising us that the augmentation in positive review of the movie is an indicator that there is no problem in content of the movie. But this is totally wrong analogy. Since there are less number of people in audience and they have come because they earlier liked the movie thats why the increase in positive review has been noticed. This review is giving only a partial opinion regarding the content of the movie. Drawing a conclusion that the content of the movie is good one is not a logical one. If author could give us more information abouth the contnet of the moview which proves it to be good one, then his or her claim could be a string one.
Secondly, the review given by the small section of the society can be biased or not a disinterested one. The review might be influenced by some personal gain and it might not be a genuine one. We dont have any information in the given snippet about the credibility of the review given by the reviewers. If author could give us the information about the background of the audiences and their reviews then his claim could be more credulous for us.
Thirdly, the author is trying to convey to us that the lack of publicity of the movie is the reason of the scarcity in number of audiences of the movie. But, it could be possible that it is the taste of the audiences that is driving to this decrease in number. Most of the audiences might find that the genre of the movie does not suit them that shwy they have not come for the new version of the movie. There is no data or imformation given by the author to deny this fact. If he or she could give such details, his argument could be more acceptable to us.
Fourthly, there might be that problem in collection of the review. There might be issue with the mecanism or the system of collection of review which is giving us the fallacious idea of augmentation of positive reviews. There is no information given by the author about the review system. His argumbet could be more believable for us if he could mentions such information.
Fifthly, there is no detials given by the author about how the advertising campain will happen and how mush it will cost and how it can compell the people to see their movie. Without such information allocating budget would be a action without clause which may in turn make derimental effect on the economic condition of the Super Screen Procuction Company. Hence, these information should be their from the author side to make his claim more viable to us.
Therefore, due to the lack of information and resoning the claim that the author is giving is not a string one to believe. He could apprise us about the review system, the background of reviewers, more ground level study and data about the decrease in number of viewers and the details of the campaign of teh advertisement. This information could give us a strong point to accept his or her claim.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by advertising. The director is telling that the increase in percentage of posit...
^^
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'directors'' or 'director's'?
Suggestion: directors'; director's
...th of publicity of the movie. While the directors argument may be tempting but there are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...me because they earlier liked the movie thats why the increase in positive review has...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n and it might not be a genuine one. We dont have any information in the given snipp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e taste of the audiences that is driving to this decrease in number. Most of the ...
^^
Line 9, column 347, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
...d be more believable for us if he could mentions such information. Fifthly, there is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d mentions such information. Fifthly, there is no detials given by the author ...
^^
Line 11, column 229, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... information allocating budget would be a action without clause which may in turn...
^
Line 11, column 367, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...Super Screen Procuction Company. Hence, these information should be their from the author side to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.6327345309 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 28.8173652695 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 55.5748502994 153% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2925.0 2260.96107784 129% => OK
No of words: 636.0 441.139720559 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59905660377 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02185627292 4.56307096286 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5224923672 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.361635220126 0.468620217663 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 920.7 705.55239521 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6054606835 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.862068966 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9310344828 23.324526521 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72413793103 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104314728543 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032407125629 0.0743258471296 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630984405107 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617876312828 0.128457276422 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077688079483 0.0628817314937 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.3550499002 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.5979740519 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.