An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
As the author says that, an international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. And recommending that this engineered breed should be accepted into the fight against the vitamin A deficiency. But, before that the author needs to give explanations about some questions, so that his claim will be accepted. The questions are described in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the name of the international development organization is not given so questions arises here is that is the international development organization is real or not? Even if the organization is genuine, there not even mentioned that how they got the information that the Tagus area is impoverished and they have deficiency of vitamin A? Have they done surveys to find out the food patterns and daily, requirements of the people? Are they having sufficient evidence to prove that thing? Or are they making these assumptions to marketing their product.
Secondly, the international development organization claims that have engineered a new breed of millet which is high in the vitamin A. Whether the new breed developed by the international development organization is sufficient to complete the deficiency caused by poor habits of people?
Third, they also claimed that the new breed's cost is high, so they are giving the subsidies for the farmers. But, they have not said any percent for the subsidy.
Fourth, they also said that the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet. But, it is possible that the government of the Tagus may not be economically good. Then, what is possibility that they can support the population?
According to this, the statement made by the officer of the international development organization is faulty as the given questions are answered.
- One year ago, Glengood Health Center in Turnville decided to start a health awareness program for its community. Since that time, Glenwood's share of patients in the Turnville area has significantly increased. Further, a nationwide survey indicates that m 50
- Claim : The importance of multidisciplinary education is overrated in today's times.Reason : Education should be focused on preparation for a specific career path and thus students should be encouraged to only pursue a single area of study. 50
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 58
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241982507289 0.25644967241 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.174927113703 0.15541462614 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.067055393586 0.0836205057962 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0466472303207 0.0520304965353 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0408163265306 0.0272364105082 150% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.122448979592 0.125424944231 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0583090379009 0.0416121511921 140% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.14348011313 2.79052419416 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0233236151603 0.026700313972 87% => OK
Particles: 0.00291545189504 0.001811407834 161% => OK
Determiners: 0.128279883382 0.113004496875 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0174927113703 0.0255425247493 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116618075802 0.0127820249294 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1927.0 2731.13054187 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 446.07635468 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21612903226 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.57801047555 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345161290323 0.378187486979 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274193548387 0.287650121315 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21935483871 0.208842608468 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.183870967742 0.135150697306 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14348011313 2.79052419416 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 207.018472906 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.469332199767 103% => OK
Word variations: 48.1434552253 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2352941176 23.2022227129 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9924771944 57.7814097925 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.352941176 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 23.2022227129 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.724660767414 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 45.6546489564 51.9672348444 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.61111111111 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419384222008 0.441005458295 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151262760777 0.135418324435 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0777859330717 0.0829849096947 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.6368371128 0.58762219726 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.186161091824 0.147661913831 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177808982884 0.193483328276 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172188256193 0.0970749176394 177% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.351640279749 0.42659136922 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0663075947834 0.0774707102158 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269384263701 0.312017818177 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140351319015 0.0698173142475 201% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.