In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far fewer sick leaves than employees working in the buildings cleaned with the other cleaners. Therefore, to prevent employee illness, all companies should use CleanAll as their industrial cleaners.
Write the response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The author of the argument states that all companies should use CleanAll cleansing agent.
The main assumption here is that the fewer sick leaves by the employees of the companies which used the CleanAll cleanser was related to only to the clean surroundings of the building in which they worked. The argument assumes that the other companies whose employees took more sick leaves had fallen ill primarily due to the dirtier and unhygenic surroundings of the building in which they worked.
Based on this assumption the argument urges all companies to use CleanAll as their industrial cleanser. However this assumption may not necessarily be true. The fewer sick leaves in the employees of the companies using CleanAll could be due to their healthy lifestyle. It could be possible that the employees in these companies take better care of their health which gets reflected in the fewer sick leaves taken by them. CleanAll may thus have no direct relation to employees taking sick leaves.
If the assumption proves out to be unwarranted, then inspite of using CleanAll the sick leaves taken by the employees of the company may not get reduced at all. In fact they may rise if the employees start following an unhealthy routine after the use of CleanAll. So there would be no reason of using CleanAll to mainly prevent employee illness.
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far 18
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 33
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far 23
- Some people believe that competition drives young athletes to perform at their best, while others believe that competition discourages those who are not athletically talented from participating in organized sports. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s of the building in which they worked. The argument assumes that the other compani...
^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s all companies to use CleanAll as their industrial cleanser. However this assump...
^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...CleanAll as their industrial cleanser. However this assumption may not necessarily be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 2260.96107784 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 224.0 441.139720559 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99107142857 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57334997659 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 705.55239521 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5926239163 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173664478686 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824186452444 0.0743258471296 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444975272206 0.0701772020484 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116741951182 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221497519834 0.0628817314937 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 98.500998004 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.