Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flue were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person wil die as a result of the inoculation, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The argument talks about possibility of saving lives against cow flu using inoculations. It specifically says that if inoculations against cow flu were administered routinely many lives can be saved. However, there is slight possibility of a person dying due to inoculations against cow flu.
To evaluate the argument evidence which will prove several hypothesis that are namely,
(1) Routine inoculations against cow flu saves lives
(2) There is probability of a person dying from inoculation against cow flu
If there is any positive or negative deviations in the above hypothesis, the arguments will weaken or strengthen.
In the case of fluctuations in hypothesis (1) and keeping hypothesis (2) constant, if the routine inoculations against cow flu does not saves lives or is not effective,the argument is strengthen as inoculation will just heighten the risk of death of the person.
In case of fluctuations in the hypothesis (2) and keeping hypothesis (1) constant, if the routine inoculations against cow flu has very low probability of the person dying the argument will be weaken however, if the probability of a person dying due to inoculations against cow flu is high then the argument is strengthen.
So the evidence to check the extent of validity of the hypothesis (1) and (2) is needed to evaluate the argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hypothesis seems to be countable; consider using: 'several hypotheses', 'several hypothesises'.
Suggestion: several hypotheses; several hypothesises
... the argument evidence which will prove several hypothesis that are namely, 1 Routine inoculatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 133, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'save'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: save
...e inoculations against cow flu does not saves lives or is not effective,the argument ...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 133, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'save'
Suggestion: save
...e inoculations against cow flu does not saves lives or is not effective,the argument ...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...does not saves lives or is not effective,the argument is strengthen as inoculation w...
^^^^
Line 15, column 181, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
...ves or is not effective,the argument is strengthen as inoculation will just heighten the r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 308, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
...st cow flu is high then the argument is strengthen. So the evidence to check the exte...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 28.8173652695 10% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 2260.96107784 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 215.0 441.139720559 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22325581395 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2133106078 2.78398813304 115% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 204.123752495 44% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413953488372 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 705.55239521 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.302211684 57.8364921388 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.428571429 119.503703932 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 23.324526521 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.70786347227 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 5.15768463074 155% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28014722612 0.218282227539 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181222318073 0.0743258471296 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878003539637 0.0701772020484 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151480219236 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129332388798 0.0628817314937 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.3799401198 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.3550499002 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 98.500998004 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.