In the preceding argument, the author claims nature's way tends to open a new branch in Plainsville due to the healthy area reputation, depends on this assumption they will gain the most successful profits. As long as, the argument is based in premises. Firstly, the residents prefer healthy lifestyle. Secondly, citing report indicate the resident's consumption for health related products. Thirdly, the school children as a potential consumers. Hence, in the first glance it may seem plausible. However, careful scrutiny sheds light on plethora on assumptions that could undermine the value of the argument.
To begin with, because Plainsville's residents have a healthy life, the argument readily states the new branch will be very successful, even though, the author fails to mention multifarious factors such as, how they are healthy, the kind, amount of food they consumed and if they do any exercises. Moreover, fails to states the external factors that have direct effect on the humankind health like noise, pollution, and the life stress. Thus, drawing the conclusion unreasonable at all.
Second, the argument could have been much clearer if it provided more information about the local report how was carried out and generalization the result for taking such decision. Furthermore, buying running shoes and exercise clothes are not a significant indicator about their fitness, simply might be a global trend to show their favorite team. For example, nowadays living the football world cup and every person has favorite team and to indicate their preference they buy T-shirts and shoes matching their teams.
Thirdly, the argument relies on what might be false analogy which is the local health club has more members and full training classes, the author assumes increasing without know the actual number of this rising, it might be very nuances without crucial impact. Moreover, assuming school children will buy the nature's product is not mandatory because they do not need to buy it two times. In other words, once the semester begin all students have to have all the requirements to the end of the academic year.
In conclusion, the argument fails to mention one of the key factors. Namely, the relation between opining a new branch and the assumed thriving reasons was equivocal. So, without complete information, the argument unsubstantiated and open to debate.
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 75
- tpo 30 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 60
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 50
Essay evaluation report
here goes a sample:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/natures-way-chain-…
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 379 350
No. of Characters: 1945 1500
No. of Different Words: 216 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.412 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.132 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.598 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.947 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.041 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.842 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.274 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.509 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.025 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...e. Secondly, citing report indicate the residents consumption for health related products...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consumer'?
Suggestion: consumer
...dly, the school children as a potential consumers. Hence, in the first glance it may seem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'state'.
Suggestion: state
...ey do any exercises. Moreover, fails to states the external factors that have direct e...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'natures'' or 'nature's'?
Suggestion: natures'; nature's
..., assuming school children will buy the natures product is not mandatory because they d...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e all the requirements to the end of the academic year. In conclusion, the arg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 379.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2981530343 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68199023414 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585751978892 0.468620217663 125% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 71.4579472637 57.8364921388 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.684210526 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15789473684 5.70786347227 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121035567822 0.218282227539 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295534640462 0.0743258471296 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393568503223 0.0701772020484 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627252449203 0.128457276422 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369254112916 0.0628817314937 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 12.3882235529 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.