"Nosinia is an herb that many users report to be as effective as prescription medications at fighting allergy symptoms Researchers recently compared Nosinia to a placebo in 95 men and women with seasonal allergies to ragweed pollen Participants in the study reported that neither Nosinia nor the placebo offered significant relief. However, for the most severe allergy symptoms, the researchers reported that Nosinia was more effective than the placebo in providing relief. Furthermore, at the end of the study, participants given Nosinia were more likely than participants given a placebo to report feeling healthier. We therefore recommend using Nosinia to help with your severe allergy symptoms.
At first glance the author's argument appears to be convincing, but further reflection reveals that the article has many flaws with various assumptions .To begin with, the argument relies on the assumption that Nosinia is better than placebo in treating allergies. To strengthen the argument the author must at least show that the success rate of patients recovering from allergies using nosnia as a pre-scripted medicine. The article provides an insufficient information regarding the recoveries using medicine.
There are several other possible errors relating to the failure of the article, the research conducted has significantly less amount of information with only 95 men and women combined for testing . conducting this research on such a less resource will definitely lead to errors as many people may develop allergies to nosnia too! Instead of making a sweeping statement based on insufficient data, the author must provide evidence using a larger sample space for better results.
Moreover the age group of the people is not provided as the younger age grouped people will have a greater immunity rate than the older people .The author in this context has not taken the previous health issues and allergies of the people as these factors have significant and a direct relation with the recovery of people using nosnia. Furthermore people with severe allergy symptoms may have taken other antibiotics to prevent any fatal results which strengthened the effects nosnia. based on a unjust comparison with placebo the author recommends using nosnia to help with allergies which can be fatal.
In conclusion this argument is weak as it fully depends upon the immunity of the selected small amount of participants. The unanswered questions like the success rate of recovery, make the argument poorly supported and short-sighted. The author, in order to improve the research must take into account the allergies and side-effects caused by the use of nosnia on people which may be fatal
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | raghavchauhan619 | 75 | view |
| 2022-09-29 | Yashika_B | 66 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | nira07 | 58 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Tej | 55 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | idris oriyomi | 70 | view |
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 317 350
No. of Characters: 1651 1500
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.22 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.208 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.708 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.225 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.399 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.648 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.073 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
At first glance the authors argument app...
^^^
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
At first glance the authors argument appears to be convincing, but ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... has many flaws with various assumptions .To begin with, the argument relies on th...
^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...as many flaws with various assumptions .To begin with, the argument relies on the ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...garding the recoveries using medicine. There are several other possible errors ...
^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ly 95 men and women combined for testing . conducting this research on such a less...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conducting
...95 men and women combined for testing . conducting this research on such a less resource w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...r sample space for better results. Moreover the age group of the people is not prov...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ater immunity rate than the older people .The author in this context has not taken...
^^
Line 6, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...er immunity rate than the older people .The author in this context has not taken th...
^^^
Line 6, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...th the recovery of people using nosnia. Furthermore people with severe allergy symptoms may...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l results which strengthened the effects nosnia. based on a unjust comparison wit...
^^
Line 6, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Based
...which strengthened the effects nosnia. based on a unjust comparison with placebo the...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 498, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...engthened the effects nosnia. based on a unjust comparison with placebo the auth...
^
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fatal. In conclusion this argument is weak as it fully depends upon the imm...
^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cess rate of recovery, make the argument poorly supported and short-sighted. The ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, at least, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 317.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31545741325 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75257124725 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.098565923 57.8364921388 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.181818182 119.503703932 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 23.324526521 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 5.70786347227 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 16.0 5.25449101796 305% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183907002323 0.218282227539 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737553132636 0.0743258471296 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503366967186 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109824941825 0.128457276422 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257046057799 0.0628817314937 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.3799401198 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.3550499002 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32208582834 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.