In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in Waymarsh was the mystery novel. Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits.
In this argument the author claims that the respondents i.e. the waymarish citizens misrepresented their reading habits, at first it seems plausible but after a careful analysis it became clear that it contains a number of flaws and the author has to provide the following evidences in order to make the argument more sound.
Firstly, the author claimed that most of the citizens prefered literary classics as reading material, at first it seems plausible but the author doesn't mentioned the exact number of people on which this data is taken. Maybe he has taken this survey on a small group of people only which prefer to read literary classics. So a proper number of data is required. Also, different age group prefer to read differeent type of reading material for instance, Children of the age group 3-10 mostly prefer to read Marvel comics or some Sci-fi novels and old people read literary classics so in order to prove he is right, author has to give the statistical data that on which type of population this survey has taken,
Secondly, the author claimed that the number of mystery novels have checked out the most from the public libraries so they misrpresented their habits in the first place, at first it seems plausible but after the meticulous study it becomes clear that it conatins flaws such as the number of check out novels from the public library doesn't mean they have misrepresented their reading habits, they can purchase the other reading material from the other book stores. Also the author doesn't mentioned the presence of other libraries, there maybe the other libaries too in which the number of checked out novels are different. It is also possible that the other category novel readers read the novels while sitting in libararies only. So just on the basis of checked out novels we can't say that they have misrepresented their reding habits.
Last but not the least the same researchers took the data again, as they firstly made the error there is possibility of making mistake again in collecting the data. So validation, authenticity of data is required, study of other researchers is also needed.
So at the end i would like to conclude that the statement contain number of flaws and in order to prove this statement right author have to answer those flaws, after that we can say that they have misrepresented their rerading habits.
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings. 50
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 58
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved. 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 66
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."- 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...first it seems plausible but the author doesnt mentioned the exact number of people on...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...heck out novels from the public library doesnt mean they have misrepresented their rea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ng material from the other book stores. Also the author doesnt mentioned the presenc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the other book stores. Also the author doesnt mentioned the presence of other librari...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t on the basis of checked out novels we cant say that they have misrepresented their...
^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...earchers is also needed. So at the end i would like to conclude that the stateme...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to, for instance, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 28.8173652695 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 403.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88089330025 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50271235606 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434243176179 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.8473053892 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 203.936183504 57.8364921388 353% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.818181818 119.503703932 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6363636364 23.324526521 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 5.70786347227 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188855310681 0.218282227539 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706926220018 0.0743258471296 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636728251129 0.0701772020484 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943899608498 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062962286316 0.0628817314937 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.3799401198 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.1389221557 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.