In the argument, the author concludes that all female education will increase the morale of the students and alumnae will be convinced to continue supporting the institute economically. The author comes to this conclusion based on several premises and two surveys carried by students and the alumnae. Although, the authors contention might ultimately prove valid, as it stands now, the author’s argument rests on three unwarranted assumptions which significantly hampers its credibility.
First of all, the author assumes that there is a casual relationship between the all female education and the morale among students, but this might not be the case. Perhaps the inclusion of the coeducation would make much diverse nature in the institute and this will help the students to learn from eachother, from opposite gender and thus increase the morale. In addition, it is possible that coeducation possibly help them developing their thought while studying together. If either of the scenerio proves true, then the author’s contention is significantly weakened.
Moreover, the author presumes, without justification that the serveys are performed scientifically and the intension of the participants of the servey were true. Perhaps the students and the alumnae responded to the survey casually and the survey was not the representation of the true fact. If it is true that the survey was perfomed in non-empirical manner, then the authors contention is hampered greatly.
Finally, the author assumes that the alumnae will keep supporting the college economically but that might not be true. If the college is not capable of enrolling more students in the institute or if the enrolling of the students decreases then the alumnae might not support the institute financially. If this proves to be true, then the authors contention will lose its credibility.
To conclude, the authors central claim might prove true but the author needs to give proper evidence of the alternate to bolster the persuasiveness of his argument. The author might also need to give prove that the surveys was performed scientifically.
- We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather than admit men into its programs It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation arguing that it would encourage more students to 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather than admit men into its programs It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation arguing that it would encourage more students to 50
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 331 350
No. of Characters: 1743 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.265 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.266 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.888 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.994 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.389 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.389 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...students and the alumnae. Although, the authors contention might ultimately prove valid...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ble that coeducation possibly help them developing their thought while studying together. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...fomed in non-empirical manner, then the authors contention is hampered greatly. Finall...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ly. If this proves to be true, then the authors contention will lose its credibility. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in addition, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 2260.96107784 79% => OK
No of words: 331.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39274924471 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97676461801 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471299093656 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9013925279 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.70786347227 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119296391244 0.218282227539 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466772907354 0.0743258471296 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279659499879 0.0701772020484 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726123373387 0.128457276422 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362242984385 0.0628817314937 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.