Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
There is always a benefit in taking a holistic approach when presenting a point of view. An argument or a point of view which fails to present a convincing response/argument towards contrasting view points and doubts is a week argument as no consideration is made to assess the aspects of the view point that are criticized /doubted by opposing viewpoints.
In contrast, an argument which presents its strength and address convincingly and adequately the contrasting viewpoints/doubts is a strong view point as it uses a holistic approach to thoroughly assess all aspects of the view point and fully address potential doubts/critics raised. Presenting such a thoroughly assessed point of view is more attractive than presenting a point of view without properly defending the opposite views and doubts.
Often view points that only present their side of the truth are condensed and shorter. Such viewpoints assume that most people understand the concepts the same way , so the analysis of the points from a contrasting angle is not thorough. However, when we understand that there are opposing views, we become crtical in our writing and we unpack each of our sentences with an in-depth analysis. As we start to question our view points, we uncover more interesting facts that we would not notice if we don’t respond to the contrasting views. Hence the more convincingly we address questions from opposite point of view, our point of view becomes stronger and more thorough.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-09-27 | Reham Youssef | 70 | view |
2013-01-07 | ahasanul06 | 85 | view |
2012-11-15 | ebwet | 43 | view |
2012-07-02 | Shrenik18 | 80 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 65
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reas 80
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.Write a res 43
- Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
flaws:
No. of Words: 244 350
No. of Characters: 1211 1500
No. of Different Words: 121 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 244 350
No. of Characters: 1211 1500
No. of Different Words: 121 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.952 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.963 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.766 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 91 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.126 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.481 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.636 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.276 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5