Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trends, and concepts that those facts illustrate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Students are the pillars of tomorrow's world. They ought to be properly guided in order to take a country to greater heights. Bringing the students to the right path is the due responsibility of the teachers. A student spends most of his days at school and college. Hence it is of utmost importance that educators adopt the right method of assessing students' learning. The assessment must be based on how well the student is able to apply the facts learned to the real life situations.
First of all, many students today tend to mug up the facts and figures. Henceforth, they find an easy way to ace the exams with top grades. However, the rote method of learning, does not reflects one's real understanding. Many of the students, just mug up facts by forming mnemonics and other funny techniques. They never realize the applications of whatever they are learning. This is evident in the transition stage from school to college. In schools, students are given prescribed textbooks and they expect a set of questions to appear in their exams. But, when these students enter the college, the situation turns upside down. Only a thorough understanding of the subjects can help students ace their exams with outstanding grades in the college level.
Secondly, the grasp of ideas alone does not serve any purpose to one's life. The reason for many students blaming the education system of their country is that, they really do not know how to apply what they have learned to the real world. This conception can be rectified only if students are in a position to explain the concept and reason behind the facts they have learned. For example, while learning programming languages, students are often told to memorize the syntax. Instead of memorizing blindly, they must be taught about the background process: the phases of compilation of a program and why the syntax has to be given in a specified format. This will create interest in learning new things and the students will also benefit out of application-oriented critical reasoning.
In today's world, students are just learning for namesake purpose and earning a degree to land up in a job. Hardly they realize the beauty of their chosen Majors. Even people who choose the most coveted Computer Science Engineering, end up as a Consultant in some financial firm. Therefore, to pull students to do research work, they need to realize the various advantages and happiness involved in performing a research and inventing a new concept. This will be feasible, only if the students have a good basic background of the working of already established facts or ideas. In good olden days, scientists did not enroll themselves in a Ph.D program to invent a new device. Instead, they found new concepts accidentally, when they were deeply indulged in performing their scientific experiments. Only if the theory(facts) are backed up with lab work(illustration of facts), will a student get interested in thinking out of the box and opting for research.
Above all, some may quote that understanding the ideas, trends and concepts behind each and every fact can take a lot of time. On the other hand, this time spent in understanding does not go in vain. They strengthen the foundation and pave way for a bright future. Facts which are learned with complete understanding through live experiment results, stay in one's mind forever. Hence they foster creativity and innovation in young minds. Thus, the claim of time being wasted does not hold good.
Therefore, educators must base their evaluation of students' learning on the understanding of facts for the following reasons: avoiding rote memorization and encouraging in-depth understanding, getting interested knowing the real-life applications of the facts concerned, indulging in hard core research work for the betterment of society. If this form of teaching methodology is followed in all the countries, then there will be millions of Doctoral Candidates presenting their thesis every year!
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 90
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. 65
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup 75
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they contrast with the points made in the reading. 97
- AGREE/DISAGRE? Childhood is the happiest time of a person's life 100
Comments
It is a great essay if you
It is a great essay if you manage to write more than 600 words in 30 minutes. If no, try to be more realistic and write something shorter then this topic. In reality, it is more difficult to express all the necessary thoughts in a short essay than in the long one.
Sentence: Only if the theoryfacts are backed up with lab workillustration of facts, will a student get interested in thinking out of the box and opting for research.
Error: theoryfacts Suggestion: theory facts
Sentence: Therefore, educators must base their evaluation of students' learning on the understanding of facts for the following reasons: avoiding rote memorization and encouraging in-depth understanding, getting interested knowing the real-life applications of the facts concerned, indulging in hard core research work for the betterment of society.
Error: rote Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Words: 657 350
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.025 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 37 15
No. of Words: 657 350
No. of Characters: 3250 1500
No. of Different Words: 328 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.063 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.947 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.789 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 225 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 181 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 129 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 75 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.757 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.642 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.514 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.225 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.422 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.025 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5