Five years ago, the local university built two new dormitories through different contractors: Aleph Construction and Gimmel Builders. The buildings were nearly identical, though it cost Gimmel Builders approximately 20 percent more to construct their dormitory. Aleph’s dormitory, however, has required approximately 10 percent more in maintenance costs per year over the past five years. Therefore, to construct their new dormitory with the lowest overall cost, the local university should hire Aleph Construction.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions in the expert’s claim. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The writer of the argument concludes that the university should choose Aleph Construction to build new dormitory since it costs less to construct a dormitory; however, it needs more money spending on maintenance. I would think that this conclusion cannot be accepted as it is in that it rests on a number of premises all of which can be challenged in one way or another; moreover it dismisses some assumptions which are important to draw an accurate conclusion.
The first problem with the argument is that the author assumes that lower difference between percentages means lower difference between real numbers. This notion is not tenable mathematically. It is possible that overall cost that Gimmel Buildrs puts on the university would be less than Aleph Construction. Therefore, the author should consider the real numbers to decide which contractor is more cost efficient. Moreover, by considering the time value of money, it might turn out that the other contractor cost more money.
The second problem with the argument is that the conclusion is based on the fact that these two contractors offer the same prices for construction as they did five years ago. It is more reasonable to contact the contractors and realize the new prices. Not only the price of construction is important, but also the price of maintenance matters is notable.
The third problematic issue about the argument is that the author supposed that the university has to choose just between these two contractors. Probably there would be other contractors that can build a dorm with less cost. It is better for university to consider other options.
Ultimately, while the presented hypothesis is interesting, I would think that according to the above explanations, it suffers from lack of accuracy. The result of the research can only be accepted if the weaknesses already referred to are all removed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-10-28 | soodimilani | 70 | view |
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city s electric expenses by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light emitting diodes LEDs The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn out a 88
- Issue Topic 2 School should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood 69
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified the job should go to the applicant with more experience Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 86
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when school buildings are in need of repair.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this recommendation and explain your rea 90
- A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 percent less likely to be involved in a work-related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave. Researchers hypothesiz 40
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1542 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.023 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.808 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.467 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.528 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.579 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.028 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5