The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a listener-supported public radio station.
"For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters of our station have written to complain about what they describe as the un-American bias of the program. In addition, the local newspaper has published a recent editorial critical to our shift in programming. Therefore, in order to forestall any further adverse publicity for the station and to avoid the loss of additional listener-supporters, we should discontinue our current emphasis on Latino and world music and restore the time devoted to traditional American folk music to its former level."
Respond by writing an essay in which you discuss the specific evidence you would need to judge the validity of the argument and explain how this evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In a move to widen the supporter base, the radio station has allocated more time to Latino and world music at the expense of traditional American folk music for the past year. In response to this move, many long term supporters of the station have indited complains against the move. Moreover, the move was criticized by the local newspaper in an editorial. The author's idea of broadening the listeners of the station by allocating less time to American folk and more to Latino music and world music is incoherent. Changes made in the programming be made in compliance with the opinion of the listeners as they are the targets. However, it is unclear if any survey was taken prior to this move in order to find out about people's interests. It is quite natural for long term listeners to complain about the move as they naturally preffered the old program. Likewise, the author has not elaborated on the newspaper, which makes it unclear to comprehend what were they critical about.
The manager believes that the current emphasis on Latino music should be discontinued in order to forestall loss of additional listener supporters, by reverting back to the former mode. By doing this, the station would lose its current listeners that it would have mustered by the new move. Based on the letters of long term listeners and the recent article that appeared in the paper, it would be unwise to make a sudden change, as the station would be repeating the same mistake as the one it did a year ago. It is rather advisable to take people's opinion on the current program before makes any changes. If the survey reports are favorable to the new move, then is wouldn't require a change at all.
By allocating more time to the American folk, it could lose its current listeners, hence a conclusive decision has to be made after doing some research in order to be sure about the target audience. Moreover, suggestions can be taken from them in order to avoid further complains.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-07-31 | natasha_vinod | 63 | view |
2012-07-10 | aarkadatta | 64 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a listener-supported public radio station."For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk m 63
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 40
- What discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing a game is fun only when you win Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 73
Sentence: It is quite natural for long term listeners to complain about the move as they naturally preffered the old program.
Error: preffered Suggestion: preferred
flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
better to have 5 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction. my choice: A or B. agree or disagree
para 2: reason 1
para 3: reason 2
para 4: reason 3 (optional)
para 5: conclusion
Better to put more contents to get higher marks. For issue essays, around 450+ words, for argument essays, around 400+ words.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 344 350
No. of Characters: 1595 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.307 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.637 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.492 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.933 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.306 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.485 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5