Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you

Art can be defined as creative works whose purpose is to add beauty to human spiritual life - everything from great pictures, statuses to beautiful piece of music are art. Based on this definition, the integrity of the arts can be understood as the ability of artworks, on average, to preserve the creativity and holy purposes, serving life rather than personal gains or monetary values, in each masterpieces.

Despite its imperative importance, most artists are struggle to earning enough for their daily life and be able to pursuing their works. With the fast paced life and the boom of various of new entertainment means such as movies and theme parks, people hardly spare time to enjoy the beauty of high-state art, mostly because Art masterpieces are not easily accessible or wide available for public - you need to go to exhibition or museum to gaze with veneration at them. This vastly decrease in art enjoying demand seriously deters the enthusiasm of artists whose most craving desire is to bring their talents to serve the life.

In addition, the general economic downturn nowadays further aggravates the future of artists because people tend to spend money only on basic commodity such as clothes, food or cheap machine-made products. Because art products are usually more expensive than mass-produced ones and apparently for decorative purpose only , it is usually considered as luxury and less deserving need, especially with the limited financial condition.

Both factors above lead to less and less space for artists who followed high-state art in modern life, which put the artists out of their job due to insufficient capital. In this circumstance, the government funding is surely necessary to lift of the otherwise grim future of truly artists so that such high-state art can be flourish and be available for everyone. For example, the incorporation of high state-of-the-art statuses in public places such as parks, offices, beaches is to make art easily accessible to everyone and also creating more jobs for artists. Another way to support art is regularly organizing the free or subsidized exhibition so that the price of enjoying art lower and affordable by most members of a society.

In the contrary, many people oppose the idea of increasing governmental support for art because of the fear that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. This believe is quite unreasonable, it is like the popularly believe that having lot of money erodes your personality. It is depend on the how the money is used not the money or funding itself that decides whether this tangible material can be good or bad. For instance, governmental fund should be granted for only worthy artists or organizations who or which have gone through a stringent examination of highly competent committees. With a appropriate regulations, government funding can be used to protect the integrity of arts from being degraded because supports from authority either in tangible or intangible forms would alleviate artists from monetary burden so that they can focus on creativity and their ideals.

In conclusion, government funding for art is necessary to ensure that art is available and accessible to everyone in the public which in turn promote the art enjoying and enhance its value in life of every member of public. With proper and effective regulations, government funding would play a part in protest the integrity of art by alleviate the financial burden shouldered by artists in such economic difficulty and modern lifestyle.