19-)“Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humanbeing is a special kind among the all creatures. They are the social ones and they meet their basic needs together. Since they live together, throughout the history they need to obey some rules, i.e., they come together and create a kind of contract that all people should follow, otherwise some who have more power in their hand can behave to the others brutally. So, laws comes to scene and it has been progressing since it appeared. I mainly agree this prompt but there is some missing approach in this recommendation.
To start with, laws cannot be strict because events and interpreting these events may change from time to time, people to people and also from location to location. Even though our two hands are different from each other, how can we approach to totally different events that happened in different times, at different place and among different people. Just observing the event ang making decision about this event is not logical. In the same event at different times peoples intention may have completely different, some may be guilty under his circumstances but the same guy could be innocent in the other similar event if he enrolled this event.
However,there is another side of the coin. It may be true that laws should be flexible, if we do not draw the boarders of this flexibility, then we can face some misuse of the law. People can change these rules for their own benefits. All people should be equal before the law and this can be satisfied with some inflexibility in the rules of the game because if the limitations and borders are known well, then people who have the authority over the other people and tend to misuse this authority know their punishments well and take their actions regardinly.
To conclude, people need to laws because of their social life. Laws should be flexible because things change with the time and location dimension. However, it should be flexible to some extent, otherwise people easily morph the rules according to their desires when they get the power.
- shortened work week 3
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 70
- shortening workweek 73
- “Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather th 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...nt if he enrolled this event. However,there is another side of the coin. It may be ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88150289017 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47195671801 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0099359064 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5625 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920614716828 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352377701372 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369114996416 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670431086923 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409696981231 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.