3. Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade 劝阻 students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to
address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that the educational institutions should discourage the students to choose the areas that they are less likely to success. Admittedly, it is useful and practical for certain students. Yet, its disadvantages are far greater than its function, so I disagree with this statement.
It is true that some unrealistic pursuits should be dissuaded cause there is only little chance for the students to be successful. For instance, if a student, whose voice is like caterwauling, wants to be a popular singer and make a living on it, what suggestion would you give? Probably not encouraging him or her. Or, a student, with poor math skills, have a strong desire to pursue actuary as his or her profession. It is highly unlikely that they will succeed in these areas which they have no talents at all, so it is level-headed to dissuade these students from engaging in relevant business.
Even though it is practical to prevent students from doing what they are not good at, it is hard for any schools to predict which carriers or areas would be profiting or successful after the students’ graduating. Positions in civil engineering was greatly in short twenty years ago, while nowadays, its job market is almost satiated. On the contrary, some majors, who were not arresting at the time, develop very fast and offer tons of opportunities for young people. Computer science is just the example for it. Not many people were interested in it, or have a positive view on it. However, this area turns to one of the most promising occupations. Given that, it is extremely difficult for an educational institution to foretell the future of an industry accurately in order to prevent students from doing unlikely successful pursuits.
Moreover, even the school could predict the tendency in the future, students may not persist in it without interests. It is common that school or parents choose a major, which they believe will be profiting, for the student. Yet, not all of them will stay in these areas. For example, one student in my class likes painting from he was little, but schools and parents pushed him to major in pre-law in college. He turned out dropping out of the school. It is obvious that if the students are forced to learn what they are not interested, even it may bring high wage, it is of great possibilities that they may give up during college.
Consequently, I disagree with this statement because it may be useful for certain cases, but it is hard for schools to predict which area will be promising, and unwarranted that students will learn and participate in what they dislike for the rest of their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... obvious that if the students are forced to learn what they are not interested, e...
^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... for schools to predict which area will be promising, and unwarranted that students will lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in short, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88470066519 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74856755879 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534368070953 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5515784498 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.136363636 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205682424597 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538997107076 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563918737149 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121600656558 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044828524341 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.