There is no doubt that companies should spend more time listening to their own employees for a better work environment and efficiency. But employees themselves may be motivated by their self interest instead of company interest. Owing to the human nature, employees might advice company to work for employee benefit aggressively at the cost of company benefit which is why it may not always be in the interest of the company to solely rely on its employees' feedback to improve its operational efficiency.
Here comes the role of outside consultants. They are not the beneficiaries of the usual company perks and work culture. This makes them unbiased towards the employee welfare and allows them to focus on the company's performance as a whole. The suggestions made by the outside consultants are purely motivated by the commissions they earn as per the company performance, hence it is in their interest to better advice company on operational matters that improve its efficiency.
Having said that, it is imperative that company should maintain a balance in listening to its employees and the outside consultants. Not listening to the former may result in a poor work environment and thus lower employee performances while not getting advised by the later may cause ignorance about its state of business efficacy. A company must have an equilibrium between both feedback channels to achieve optimal productivity.
With these arguments, I beg to differ from the given statement which renders the consultants unnecessary. But of course, I support the argument that companies should spend more time listening to their employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...ng to the human nature, employees might advice company to work for employee benefit ag...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, no doubt, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 261.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27203065134 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9345757787 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3126561667 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360323303091 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141316391472 0.0831039109588 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991991106939 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228323371686 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727087061789 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.