All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
There is always competition between the companies for better establishment in a competitive market. Companies adopt various kinds of ways to overcome the difficulties to operate more efficiently. Different people may have different positions on this topic. However, In my perspective, I believe listening to their own employee will be perpetual for company benefit for various reasons as explained in the following paragraphs.
First of all, I consider employees are the backbone of the company smooth functioning on achieving the goal. Their peripheral behavior is a must. The person working on the company knows about the chaos occurring inside the company, the amount of profit and loss the company is gaining and what way the company is heading towards. Hiring someone outside consultant might be a bad move because the current situation will be not known to them so as to their own employee. For instance, if a company is in loss and cannot disclose its position to the market will not be able to hire outside consultant as fear of losing its reputation.
Furthermore, listening to employees also advances its priorities towards minor activities which ultimately help in uplifting its standard. Not only this, embracing employees in big decisions directly has impacted the character development of employees boosting their performance in the company. For example, Walmart always listens to its employee as they are the one who is in direct contact with the customers and improves according to their demand, so it is one of the successful company.
Finally, an outside consultant might be a connoisseur in one kind of area of business but the same condition might not be with every other company. Feedbacks from the employee should be considered. On the other hand, taking expert advice is sometimes is good for trail and experience.
For all these reasons, I believe the company considering the feedbacks from their own employee will help to overcome future endeavors, for the efficient operation of the company. Hiring outside consultants without remarking their own employees might hamper the productiveness of the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based o 58
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ent situation will be not known to them so as to their own employee. For instance, if a ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31470588235 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92088737287 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0067358789 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.294117647 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415927316961 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125926175656 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773216828787 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228914580818 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106436510069 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.