All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
In an ideal world, employers need not hire outside consultants to determine ways in which their companies could improve efficiency and productivity. Some are of the opinion that the desire for outside consultation would become obsolete if companies just listened to their employees more. However, this claim is not necessarily correct due to several salient reasons.
The first point to consider is the fact that, in most cases, outside consultants provide an unbiased assessment of a company's operations. They offer solutions irrespective of a hypothetical employee's feelings. Some employees would be hesitant to report to management that a coworker and friend of theirs is not pulling their weight. This kind of concealment provides basis for employers seeking outside consultants. Of course, there is still the probability that a consultant might have friends in a particular client company, but this possibility in not high and it is unlikely to significantly affect a review.
Furthermore, in cases of continuous theft or misappropriation of funds carried out by a few workers in a company, an outside auditor would be the ideal party to recognise such crimes. They are clearly disinterested, and more importantly, possess the knowledge required.
One could argue that statistics which would be used to assess the company and its worker's performance may not always tell the full story, and this is a valid point.
In the end, despite the fact that there are certain benefits to listening to employees over outside consultants, the benefits of hiring outside consultants outweigh such benefits.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, kind of, of course, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 251.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38645418327 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08023012999 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597609561753 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5175617311 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369961246297 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121680158249 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105634683412 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188060992361 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102647815265 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.