All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The author here is suggesting that the companies hiring outside consultants for suggestions to operate more efficiently should rather listen to their own employees for solutions. Although third party consultants would provide better solutions, I strongly agree with the author that employing internal solutions would be a better option. After all, the foundation of the company depends upon the performance and satisfaction of the employees.
First of all, to support my staunch I would like to point out that hiring outside consultancy services would not be a cost effective method and would probably end up in abruptly increasing the overall budget of the companies. The reason for higher costs is that most of these companies have consultancy service as their only major area of expertise. They would employ their best professional to provide innovative and aesthetic solutions for method of operations of the company. These solutions would probably also include enhancement of the company structures which would cut off a large amount of money from the company's budget. These kind of solutions would not be beneficial for companies which are entitled to lower profit margins.
Secondly, I would like to add that these consultants would suggest some alternative methods which may be resented by the employees. Many employees prefer working in an affable and free environment. Studies also suggest that companies with stringent laws are likely to perform less effectively compared to companies with flexible laws. Enforcing companies with unfavorable solutions such as long working hours, reduce paychecks just to increase the efficiency would in along period led to employees resentment.
Moreover, no one other than the employees of the company better understand the working environment of the company. Talking to the employees and coming up with solutions internally without involving the third party agencies would be the best method to come with a better working plan which will improve efficiency. For instances, consider some tech giants such as Google or Facebook. This companies provide a more employee friendly environment and discusses all the company issues internally without involvement of the other consultants. The result is that these companies are now the largest and most successful companies in the world.
On the contrary, it may sometimes be effective to consult some outside agencies. Some companies may require some major changes to overcome from growing debts or employ new work force. In such cases the outside consultants may prove more helpful.
Thus to conclude, in order to flourish in the market and to employee cost effective and employee friendly solutions the best option would be to consult the employees of the companies than to consult outside companies. This would in long run prove beneficial to both the companies and to the work force of the company as it would be cost effective and promote employee development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-09 | harsh2kumar | 50 | view |
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot permi 66
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 70
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 16
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If the companies were to listen to their employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce and satisfaction of the employees. First of all, to support my staunch I wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 641, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...ount of money from the companys budget. These kind of solutions would not be beneficial fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are entitled to lower profit margins. Secondly, I would like to add that these...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng period led to employees resentment. Moreover, no one other than the employee...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost successful companies in the world. On the contrary, it may sometimes be eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de consultants may prove more helpful. Thus to conclude, in order to flourish i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 12, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nts may prove more helpful. Thus to conclude, in order to flourish in th...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'after all', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243951612903 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.141129032258 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114919354839 0.0880659088768 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0524193548387 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0201612903226 0.0444667217837 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116935483871 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0322580645161 0.0406280797675 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79844860643 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0443548387097 0.030933414821 143% => OK
Particles: 0.00806451612903 0.0016655270985 484% => OK
Determiners: 0.116935483871 0.0997080785238 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0443548387097 0.0249443105267 178% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00806451612903 0.0148568991511 54% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3011.0 2732.02544248 110% => OK
No of words: 465.0 452.878318584 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.4752688172 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.415053763441 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.339784946237 0.280924506359 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245161290323 0.200843997647 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.187096774194 0.132149295362 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79844860643 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470967741935 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.1132282644 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1363636364 23.380412469 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1232852041 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.863636364 141.124799967 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1363636364 23.380412469 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.681818181818 0.674092028746 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 55.11485826 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.83962264151 1.64882698954 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430227877588 0.391690518653 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12608453325 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.095402000908 0.077325440228 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.585568556299 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156279597897 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171750574035 0.161403998019 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966964071266 0.0892212321368 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.314705718869 0.385218514788 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.075959904871 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292200059066 0.275328986314 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490381329189 0.0653680567796 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.4325221239 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 18.0 7.22455752212 249% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.