It is not too exaggerated to say that a leader with great leadership is the key to success for an organization, and when it comes to great leadership, sound moral judgement should always come first. An effective leader should always keep a solid moral judgement in mind when making every decision, because that is the only way to make sure an organization to not only stand out from competitors but also stand still over time.
Moral judgment is essential to an organization for it can protect the organization from deviating from the legal and moral route to success. It is not difficult to find intelligent staffs and leaders to demonstrate their abilities; however, if these staffs and leaders are lacking of sound moral judgement, it will be very risky when they are encountering dilemmas about the money moral maze. This kind of cases is not unfamiliar in financial industry showing that many smart staffs and leaders are caring more about making as much as money they can than doing the right things aligned with moral judgement, and the most famous case is 2008 financial crisis, which all started from some smart opportunists selling ill-quality mortgages loan to innocent clients in order to make money without moral judgement. Although the loan industry once reached the peak, it finally proved that a move without moral judgment will never be granted a steady success.
Moreover, leaders are expecting to be the most powerful and influential people in a group, so it's even more important for them to always bear moral judgement in mind. In that way, leaders can make the right decision, make positive influence to staffs, and lead the organization to the right track. When bringing a steady growth to an organization with their morality and abilities, leaders can then earn and maintain the respect of his or her peers naturally. Therefore, we can say that sound moral judgement is the base for an effective leader to build up his or her legacy. Only with the moral judgement can they start their journey to a successful leaders.
In conclusion, sound moral judgement is the basic requirement for a great leader, so it should always come first when speaking of the most important characteristic of an effective leader. Their success with morality will naturally help them earn the respect of his or her peers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'leader'?
Suggestion: leader
...hey start their journey to a successful leaders. In conclusion, sound moral judgemen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95907928389 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6693269959 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475703324808 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4767444496 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.153846154 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0769230769 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360071651019 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148532322619 0.0831039109588 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904125750736 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263247403428 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095915212506 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.