Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A leader by definition, is a person who is chosen by the people to act as their guide for better lives and also who can stand out for them in time of need. So, a leader's most important characteristic is to maintain a good rapport with his or her people but at the same time, it is a leader's responsibility to guide his/her people to follow an ethical path.
An idealistic leader is someone who practices strong moral values and galvanize his or her peers in doing the same. If a leader himself or herself forgoes ethics then a whole bunch of people idolizing him or her will refuse to follow morals. A leader should be veracious to his or her people in conveying his or her principles and should be able to elucidate his or her goals and the path to achieve them. Since people become amenable when it comes to their leader, a leader should be able to persuade his or her peers to follow a righteous path to achieve their goals, which is one of the prime characteristic of a leader. Also, the people's veneration for their leader should not lower when he or she makes decisions with strong moral conscience since a leader should be able to persuade his or her peers to follow him or her without any contingency with the decisions he or she takes.
So, in my opinion, since a leader is idolized by many people around him or her, it is important for him or her to have a sound moral judgment as his or her judgment influences, he or she holds a responsibility to guide his or her people with right path to fulfill their goals. He or She should be prudent when it comes to influencing people with his or her ideas for them.
Hence, for a leader to be effective should have a strong moral conscience along with maintaining the respect of his/her peers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through la 66
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 60
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society 83
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...er people but at the same time, it is a leaders responsibility to guide his/her people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'bunch'.
Suggestion: bunch
...imself or herself forgoes ethics then a whole bunch of people idolizing him or her will ref...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...e characteristic of a leader. Also, the peoples veneration for their leader should not ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, as for, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39384615385 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56690636448 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415384615385 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6476319731 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.8 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 23.4991977007 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349276185831 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1758908682 0.0831039109588 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095431824319 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251021248873 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242871278302 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.