In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
The issue here states that in any field- business, education, government-those in the power should be required to step down after five years. I am contending this issue as a broad statement given in the case, there will be an authority in each and every field, which eventually helps to run the system better and more efficient. What we have to think upon is, is it necessary or required to change the authority in different fields over a certain period of time?
Thinking upon the statement given, I would agree with what has been told here. For the reasoning upon agreeing in certain manner I would add that, it might depend upon the situation in given field and what are the different aspects of it at the end of the change of the authority. The thing, I would like to mention here, which I find most important in this case is that people involved in that field should be given the charge of whether or not they need a change or they want to continue with the same. Either of that would be choosed at the end, but what will be beneficial in the case would be, that those persons would be knowing everything about the field and whether or not the authority, which is ruling is capable of it or not.
Having a thought of the current systems in many democratic countries, we can find different positives for that. As in, different citizens will be having the right to choose with the fact that the ruling authority will have a thought back in their mind that is they will not work up to the potential and for the betterment then they might not be there in the near future. What is more beneficial is, due to that fact that there will be different oppositions of them as well and therefore, they will be trying their best to make that field better over a period of time thinking of the people who will be deciding their future.
While in the period of any ruling authority, the candidates who want a chance to be in that position or the one who is currently in that position would think upon how they can make the field better and for the enhancement of that they will try to connect with people, by which interactions among the authority and people will keep the situation neutral and more composed. Each of the person in this world will be having different kind of thoughts and different styles, procedures to do certain type of work, eventually in each and every field there will be influence of different people, thoughts, procedures and at the end more betterment. I have also read somewhere that “Change in necessary, if you are willing to make this world better, best.”
In conclusion, I would sum up it not as, the must and compulsory change required in each and every field, but for the great future and progress to be made in every field there should be one process,which should be giving a chance to each and every person eligible by having knowledge of that field and who wishes to be in that position of authority to make a step ahead.
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. 60
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 62
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinio 70
- During the past year workers at our newly opened factory reported 30 percent more on the job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries Panoply produces products very similar to those produced at our factory but its work shifts are one hour short 71
- Productivity and Rewards 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rity in different fields over a certain period of time? Thinking upon the statement given, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...hat field should be given the charge of whether or not they need a change or they want to cont...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...case would be, that those persons would be knowing everything about the field and whether ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... knowing everything about the field and whether or not the authority, which is ruling is capab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich is ruling is capable of it or not. Having a thought of the current systems ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...r best to make that field better over a period of time thinking of the people who will be deci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... every field there should be one process,which should be giving a chance to each and e...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.17747440273 0.240241500013 74% => OK
Verbs: 0.156996587031 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.061433447099 0.0880659088768 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0494880546075 0.0497285424764 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0443686006826 0.0444667217837 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138225255973 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0460750853242 0.0406280797675 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48506824557 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0307167235495 0.030933414821 99% => OK
Particles: 0.00341296928328 0.0016655270985 205% => OK
Determiners: 0.127986348123 0.0997080785238 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0494880546075 0.0249443105267 198% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0273037542662 0.0148568991511 184% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2967.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 538.0 452.878318584 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51486988848 6.0361032391 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.269516728625 0.366273622748 74% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.182156133829 0.280924506359 65% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.137546468401 0.200843997647 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10780669145 0.132149295362 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48506824557 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39405204461 0.48968727796 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.5265825893 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 41.3846153846 23.380412469 177% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.517326423 59.4972553346 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 228.230769231 141.124799967 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.3846153846 23.380412469 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 59.6002287675 51.4728631049 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.44217687075 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182753874799 0.391690518653 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.22534183646 0.123202303941 183% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.111310994869 0.077325440228 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.670318334091 0.547984918172 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17995802146 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115113559094 0.161403998019 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152978895351 0.0892212321368 171% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.550622596999 0.385218514788 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0434788623017 0.0692045440612 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153992456355 0.275328986314 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10290647584 0.0653680567796 157% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.