In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
The author of the statement claim that in any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years because surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
First, If you look at the private giants like Microsoft, Apple, Reliance Industries, all of them are having or had single leaders for many years and all of these organizations are doing exceptionally well in their field, achieved various milestones under the single leadership. So I don't think so that after every 5 years those in power should step down from their position because with time your experience will increase and help the leader in excel the organization.
Secondly, If an organization keep on changing their top leadership, after every five years then this could create chaos in the organization. Because every individual have their strategy for how the organization will work under their leadership and if the organization keep on changing their leader after every five years then the organization way of working will change after every five years and this cloud be difficult for the employees as well as for the organization to adopt the new working model.
Thirdly, In the education field, where scholars conduct or conducting a various experiment for a long time and if you keep on changing them after five years then their research work, efforts they had made for the research would have gone into the vain.
But as we know every coin has two sides, the above-prolonged leadership has too. This could have a negative side too, because if a President or a Prime Minister of a country will continue to run their government for a long period, then they might have demolished the democracy and rule like a dictator. For example, Hitler withheld the position for a decade and misused his power.
In a nutshell, we can say that in some case those in power should step down after five years won't lead to success as mentioned in first two paragraphs, but in some cases, those in power should step down after five years. Thus, in my view, the surest path to success for any enterprise isn't revitalization through new leadership most of the time.
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years. 58
- as people rely more and more on technology to solve the problem, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tones under the single leadership. So I dont think so that after every 5 years those...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r every five years then the organization way of working will change after every f...
^^
Line 11, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...rest path to success for any enterprise isnt revitalization through new leadership m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, as for, as to, for example, as well as, in my view, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93253012048 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67517633857 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486746987952 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8762235104 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.461538462 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9230769231 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 5.21951772744 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295142671179 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113057967337 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166320358078 0.0758088955206 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162164618753 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125504878707 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.