Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition
The author of the topic states an assertion that Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claims.
The government should offer free education to those who can not afford the tuition fees because by doing this not only encourage the student to pursue their dream, unfettered by financial constraints but also leads to the ideal society where everyone gets equal opportunities irrespective of gender, race, caste, financial status, for example, a hardworking and capable student belong to economically backward family, have to give up his dream as he won't able to pay his tuition fees. And thereby, the country may lose a valuable asset, if free education to him is not provided.
Secondly, this will lift the burden from the shoulder of students' families and this would enable students to concentrate on their academics and perform to their potential to fulfill their dream and also make them capable to increases income of their families.
But the problem is when people start misusing the government initiative to provide free education those who cannot afford it, for example, in-country like India, where the government provide scholarship to economically backward students, but many students from middle class or even rich family take advantage of these initiatives from the government by generating fake document from government office through bribe or power.
In nutshell, the government should offer free university education to any student who cannot afford the tuition but certain measure to be taken by them to avoid the above mention situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problem, the ability of humans to thing about themselve will surely deteriorates. 50
- financial support to other city 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 58
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the tuition fees because by doing this not only encourage the student to pursue...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to increases income of their families. But the problem is when people start mis...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rship to economically backward students, but many students from middle class or e...
^^
Line 8, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atives from the government by generating fake document from government office thr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67531098919 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.579222576 60.3974514979 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 197.5 118.986275619 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5 23.4991977007 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484618176374 0.243740707755 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23127430587 0.0831039109588 278% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.275258892684 0.0758088955206 363% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283889386906 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181237352994 0.0667264976115 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 14.1392134831 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 12.1743820225 145% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.