In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author adduces that during the progress of a task, regardless of its situation, there should consult with people who possess the countercurrent attitude toward the task. This is the claim with which I generally do concur, among the countless rearing reasons which give adherence to my perspective, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs, to support my standpoint.
The first striking fact which should be considered is comprehensiveness of the combination of the varied thoughts. Indeed, the same issue can be considered in a varied outlook by the different individuals, in this case, the elite and combined thought covers the same issue more completely than a solo perspective. This factor is also verified by the consideration of the complexity of the brain and its cerebration systems, which are controlled by the various criteria such as the previous experiences, knowledge, or family background. As long as each mankind owns different status in the mentioned criteria the captured point from the same topic is varied. In addition, the mixture of these verities covers the bigger and complete understanding of the issue. Furthermore, the effectiveness of a comprehensive view toward the issue can lead to the warranted success or at least the ratio of the making mistake will be dropped.
Another equal crux fact which should be highlighted is that no thought is flawless and each one has its pros and cons. Thus, any perspective irrespective to its side has its own failures and advantages, and these features are more bolded in the case which are compared with other ones. Besides, the difference will be more dominant if the rival of comparison is from the opposite side. In this scenario, if the considered thought and method in the progression seem right it will be continued in the identical pattern, if the idea of the opponent seems more appealing, in this case, the wise action will be the alteration of method and implementation of disagreed side.
However, there are some group believes that consideration of the opposite attitude toward the object can make the person become shaky about his process or it will be time-consuming to interchange the ideas. While these ideas in the first glance seem accurate, the underestimated fact is the actuator’s level of firmness. In another word, in an affair, while person initiate to deal with a task, he has his faith and program over the topic, and this consulting session will be only based on the evaluation of the other side’s thought. An expert should own both the faith and flexibility toward his process and actuation. If the opponent’s idea seems logical and prior to that implemented system there should be alteration; otherwise, he should keep going on his track.
To wrap it up, according to all above-mentioned facts, a professional should handle his effort with trust; on the other hand, the exchange of idea with other side gives more complete and flawless outlook toward the issue
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position 60
- tpo 34-integ 80
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.Write a response in which you dis 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 536, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ences, knowledge, or family background. As long as each mankind owns different sta...
^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...sagreed side. However, there are some group believes that consideration of the oppo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 726, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...that implemented system there should be alteration; otherwise, he should keep going on his...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te and flawless outlook toward the issue
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, while, at least, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10750507099 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00818676488 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505070993915 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3024508916 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.888888889 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3888888889 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0856639115426 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284544528576 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329446836801 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570942614354 0.150359130593 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486726642583 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.