In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author adduces that during each step of progression in any task, the actuator should have the consult with groups of people who possess the counter-current perspective toward the task. This is the claim with which I generally do concur. Among the countless rearing facts which give adherence to my outlook, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to support my standpoint.
The first striking fact which should be considered is the preciseness of the method which is based on the combination of various factors. Indeed, a comprehensive and accurate method is the one which covers the various issues simultaneously. In addition, it is obviously accepted that the brain and its cognition are so complicated issue and depend on the different variables such as the individual’s previous experiences, state of education, and family background. Consequently, based on all these variation and complexity, the same issue is understood differently by different people at the same time. Thus, if the aim of attempts in any progression is the feat, it will be a wise idea to have conversation and exchange of understanding over the topic by other people who have the opposite side toward the topic. So, the presented method will cover the different poles and deal with the issue completely and various aspects.
The second equal crux fact which should be highlighted is the no existence of flawless method. In fact, no matter how accurately and precisely all processes are organized by its actuator since the human being is responsible for its implementation, there is the possibility of making a mistake. In this scenario, having a continuous observation and controlling system over the processes will reduce the probability of this errors; furthermore, this reduction will be more magnificent if the controller possesses a critical view toward the issue. Mostly, the people who observe the issue from a different side possesses this critical attitude, since they are keener and more eager to verify their side by finding mistakes of the other side. Consequently, by this sharp and keen attitude, they can figure out the errors easier and faster than the people whose perspective aligns with the actuator.
Finally, the point which should be bolded is the accuracy and logically of the outcome of this type of progression which is based on the combination of different outlooks. With the consideration of the accuracy of the actuator’s methods, his attempt for appealing the opponents over his method’s validity causes his attempt gains more credits, since the finalized result of the progression responses all objections and disagreed outlooks and overcomes them.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned facts explicitly represent that the consulting and interconnection with people with the contrasting attitude toward the progression lead to the flawless, logical, and complete outcome.
- Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.Write a response in which you discuss the exte 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. 70
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 66
- On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n in any task, the actuator should have the consult with groups of people who possess the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this variation' or 'these variations'?
Suggestion: this variation; these variations
... background. Consequently, based on all these variation and complexity, the same issue is under...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rocesses will reduce the probability of this errors; furthermore, this reduction wil...
^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lawless, logical, and complete outcome.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, thus, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34199134199 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12807035127 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3163517111 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.176470588 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1764705882 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168030729495 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578723701955 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348776024914 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103044503738 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260490958046 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.