Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The duty and service presented by the government always have to be an issue of conflict between the people. While some people are convinced that the leader should focus on the current problems; others, on the other hand, believe that the priority should belong to the future problem. I generally agree with the first belief. Among the countless reasons, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons in what follows.
The first threshold reason justifying my outlook is that the society with a concrete and well basic faces fewer problems in comparison with the shaky fundament. In fact, as long as the people's ongoing problems do not address as desired, there will be no adherence from the leader's citizens for flourishing. Therefore, the society can counter more severe problem than before. According to the noteworthy, intelligence conducted in my country, in a case in which dwellers are on common welfare with the expected services by the government, they are twofold more supporter than the people with the less saturated desire by the government. While the people advocate their governor, he tries his best to enhance to people satisfaction and people obey him in the emergency situation. Thus, a mutual link between the governor and his people is shaped.
The next equally striking reason fortifying my idea is that the majority of the future problems are rooted in the current trivial problems. Besides, the tackling with the minor problem is easier than the complicated and arduous one. As a result, as soon as the leader solves the problem, it will be more convenient to cope with the problem. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is the instance of a cancer treatment. The cancer is a severe disease, and it could not be treated if it were well-located in the body. Otherwise, by the sooner identification of this problem by the doctor, there is a list of the cure for this problem. As the problem is identified by the doctor sooner, the patient goes through various treatments such as the chemotherapy, or surgery till he survives. Although it is not a clear evidence of the political and leadership, it can be overgeneralized in the government too. The future knotty problem is as like as cancer which by the earlier indication there is a hope of the solution.
Nevertheless, as far as this reason is concerned, I do not agree with the neglecting future problems. As a matter of fact, the government has this knowledge to forecast the future problems. If there is an emergency case which requires a well-organized schedule to address it sufficiently, the anticipation of that event is crucial for the government. However, it does not mean that spotlight has to light solely on that issue. Based on the priority of the problems, the leader should focus on the most important issue but does not underestimate the secondary problem too.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that although the government has to identify the priority of the problems, it is a sound option to address the immediate problems.
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and 50
- tpo9 86
- 1.The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station." Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the compla 75
- Tpo231 80
- tpo5 70
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226480836237 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.148083623693 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0679442508711 0.0880659088768 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0592334494774 0.0497285424764 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0400696864111 0.0444667217837 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130662020906 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0348432055749 0.0406280797675 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85481012125 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243902439024 0.030933414821 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00174216027875 0.0016655270985 105% => OK
Determiners: 0.158536585366 0.0997080785238 159% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0174216027875 0.0249443105267 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00871080139373 0.0148568991511 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3077.0 2732.02544248 113% => OK
No of words: 520.0 452.878318584 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91730769231 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363461538462 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286538461538 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198076923077 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128846153846 0.132149295362 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85481012125 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 219.290929204 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 55.0367527416 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.41799651 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.08 141.124799967 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.76 0.674092028746 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 49.4538461538 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.58450704225 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498572843208 0.391690518653 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12822979598 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0801419746046 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.591436423041 0.547984918172 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143040887048 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223171507862 0.161403998019 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110487689773 0.0892212321368 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.604982669646 0.385218514788 157% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0478577014341 0.0692045440612 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.40458889513 0.275328986314 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522360387335 0.0653680567796 80% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.30420353982 321% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 14.0 3.66592920354 382% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.