To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
The author of the issue contends that an effective leader is who possesses the highest ethical and moral standards. This is a claim with which I generally agree. Among the lots of reasons, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons in what follows.
The first exquisite reason justifying my outlook is that the leader's high ethical and moral level causes to the definite link between the people and leader. As a matter of fact, the high level of ethical and moral behavior by the governor depicts his loyalty; therefore, his people assume him as the loyal and trustworthy person. This belief leads to the cogent relationship between the people and leader. Consequently, his individuals follow his entire rules and claims, and the society becomes successful. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is my instance. My boss in the office is an ethical person, and he never lies. Thus, I count on him in any situation, and I obey whatever he asks me to do because I am sure he is genuine and wants my benefit. Although this example is not an exact political leader's instance, it can be overgeneralized to it too. Hence, the well-obeyed society cases to its success.
Next equally striking factor advocates my idea is that the existence of the moral and ethical standard causes the leader makes the decision equity. During each crucial decision, the leader tries to be justice and picks the option which does not hurt others. Thereby the people are in the common welfare. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-nine percent of the governors opt based on the ethical and moral standard are more eager to make an appropriate decision than others. This study lucidly illustrates that the right task and beliefs are shaped based on the moral and ethical standards. So, people are on the acceptable welfare without the massive difference between the people.
Nevertheless, as far as this reason is concerned, I do not agree with the author in some extents. In a case which it is an emergency situation and the final decision does not align with the moral beliefs. The leader should give priority to the people's welfare rather than his ethical understanding. While his original role and duty are serving his people and if there is a conflict between his duty and belief, his mission will gain importance. However, this situation is too scanty. It rarely occurs during the war duration, which happens so rarely. Thus, this belief cannot be accepted as a forever principle to alter my perspective totally.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that leader with the highest ethical and moral standards is more loyal and trustworthy and makes the fair decision about his people.
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 40
- For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five best selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin Furthermore a recent surve 86
- tpo40.1 80
- Tpo-extra writing 3 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? in the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them: today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives, use specific reasons and examples t 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 544, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ring the war duration, which happens so rarely. Thus, this belief cannot be accepted a...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as a matter of fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221153846154 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.142307692308 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103846153846 0.0880659088768 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0557692307692 0.0497285424764 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0692307692308 0.0444667217837 156% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0923076923077 0.12292977631 75% => OK
Participles: 0.0211538461538 0.0406280797675 52% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68656618339 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.00192307692308 0.0016655270985 115% => OK
Determiners: 0.125 0.0997080785238 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0115384615385 0.0249443105267 46% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0115384615385 0.0148568991511 78% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2794.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 471.0 452.878318584 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93205944798 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367303609342 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284501061571 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.163481953291 0.200843997647 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101910828025 0.132149295362 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68656618339 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507430997877 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 58.8648814966 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1153846154 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.705410731 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1153846154 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 46.5654907725 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.25179856115 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389405459079 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0845426105631 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0737595309679 0.077325440228 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502135426729 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177924991528 0.149214159877 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146040265389 0.161403998019 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101313315261 0.0892212321368 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.439751782266 0.385218514788 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0792076321318 0.0692045440612 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290483552596 0.275328986314 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524284864892 0.0653680567796 80% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.