To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is debatable whether an effective public official ought to possess the highest level of ethics and moral. Although it may be difficult, it is desirable for a government official to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
To begin with, it is indispensable for a public official to demonstrate good deeds as a representative of a country for educational reasons. Qualities of a president of a nation have the most powerful influence on what their people value. Ideas and value standards of citizens are, in part, molded by the policies and beliefs of a leader of a country; if a leader values A over B, it is likely that many people would start preferring A over B, just to emulate the leader. For example, a leader of Qatar endorses inequality towards foreign workders and discrimination against women. Many of the country's policies and laws are in favor of their male citizens, thus making their people to regard that policy as normal. Had the leader of Qatar possessed the highest morals, the nation would look drastically different through change in social milleu. Since the leader of Qatar is not a man of integrity, the entire nation blindly follows him, not realizing the gravity of the situation. Therefore, the leader failed to have effective outcome in enhancing well-being of the country.
Moreover, in order for a government official to have greater achievement, the ethical qualities the leader possess work as determining factors. Without possessing ethical feature at a highest level, people easily look away especially in a democratic country, and losing people's minds work as a critical factor against what the leader wants to accomplish. It is more so if the leader attempts to increase well-being of people by heightening their rights. For instance, Nelson Mandela, a former president of South Africa, ended apartheid and established higher level of equality. He was renowned for his non-violent protests and his ethical personal life. He is an inspiring figure even until now for his feats, but he would not been able to attain them without having been a moral person. Since he possessed a lot of socially desirable values, he could have a myriad of advocates, there by achieving huge advancement.
Admittedly, some political leaders who are morally corrupted had positive impacts on society, especially in economic sector. Park Jung Hee, a formet president in South Korea, achieved a rapid amelioratio in the country's economic status. However, still, he could be remembered and respected as a president who aided in economy and moral standards if he was morally upright. Even though he enabled the country to escape from poverty, he deteriorated people's minds by implanting the idea that results justify the means, which is a huge problem in South Korea nowadays.
All in all, because of aforementioned reasons, an effective political leader must be morally upright to the maximum level.
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals."One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top-selling cereal companies. 80
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 80
- In any field-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 69
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 63
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: For example, a leader of Qatar endorses inequality towards foreign workders and discrimination against women.
Error: workders Suggestion: workers
Sentence: Park Jung Hee, a formet president in South Korea, achieved a rapid amelioratio in the country's economic status.
Error: formet Suggestion: formed
Error: amelioratio Suggestion: amelioration
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 477 350
No. of Characters: 2390 1500
No. of Different Words: 246 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.673 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.01 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.794 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 201 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 147 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.682 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.163 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.591 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.509 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.156 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
.... Without possessing ethical feature at a highest level, people easily look away ...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257518796992 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.127819548872 0.157235817809 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103383458647 0.0880659088768 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0488721804511 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0451127819549 0.0444667217837 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137218045113 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0338345864662 0.0406280797675 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85917757176 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0244360902256 0.030933414821 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101503759398 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015037593985 0.0249443105267 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0112781954887 0.0148568991511 76% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2934.0 2732.02544248 107% => OK
No of words: 477.0 452.878318584 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15094339623 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.440251572327 0.366273622748 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.329140461216 0.280924506359 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.218029350105 0.200843997647 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140461215933 0.132149295362 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85917757176 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 219.290929204 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526205450734 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 62.2766280623 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6818181818 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1918955815 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6818181818 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 54.5958643034 51.4728631049 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.93220338983 1.64882698954 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375997782238 0.391690518653 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118330001733 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0791690695861 0.077325440228 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517408875896 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17569338524 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142833322082 0.161403998019 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848354415905 0.0892212321368 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.294603019695 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10073521899 0.0692045440612 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261241288839 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449501662874 0.0653680567796 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.