From my perspective, it's not necessary as well as impossible to require every public official to hold the highest ethical and moral standards. Granted, when it comes to choosing their own leaders, people tend to put forward as much as exacting prerequisites as possible -- wisdom, diplomacy, bravery and morality. However, I wonder that all of these dream standards can only be fulfill in the world of a fairy tale because of an obvious fact -- public officials are human, too.
On the one hand, there is no necessity to ask a public official to be morally perfect. Even though President Richard Nixon was morally defected regrading the Watergate scandal, he should still be viewed as a competent president due to his excellent ability in managing the country.
On the other hand, there are several detrimental consequences if people insist on a high ethical and moral standard on their public officials. First, they are, though unconsciously, pushing their officials to be hypercritical. For example, an official who dislikes his black neighborhood from his bottom of heart has to pretend that he is in harmony with them because of the afraid of being commented as "not political right". While debating with his opponents on TV, he has to pretend a smile and display a posture of respect even though he actually think his counterpart deplorable. What's worse, the demanding requirements of ethical and moral standards will gradually undermine the existence of probity. An official might conceal his past faults and feign a stainless resume since people have no tolerance of any ethical defects. But this could be prevented from happening if the voters show the willing to forgive insignificant misbehaving.
All in all, we are living in a real world rather than an ideal country. It's understandable that people want their public officials to be perfect, but considering the reality, it would be politic to focus more on a official's professional competence instead of putting too much emphasis on morals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as exacting prerequisites as possible -- wisdom, diplomacy, bravery and morality....
^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...ture of respect even though he actually think his counterpart deplorable. Whats worse...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ually think his counterpart deplorable. Whats worse, the demanding requirements of et...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y, it would be politic to focus more on a officials professional competence inste...
^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a official' or simply 'officials'?
Suggestion: a official; officials
...y, it would be politic to focus more on a officials professional competence instead of putt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, still, well, while, as to, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18654434251 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92501988967 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611620795107 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2002347836 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199984248328 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726502423745 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443473994009 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12589814811 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0095028750605 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.