To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that a public official must hold the highest moral and ethical standards in order to be an effective leader. Although the higher moral and ethical standards could not directly indicate that an officer have the ability to manage a country, the first condition being a leader is holding the highest ethical and moral standards; Thus, I strongly agree with the speaker.
To begin with, leaders must hold the highest ethical and moral standards, because they have social obligation. Leaders have to regard the public interests as first priority rather than personal interests; They should not sacrifice public interests because of personal interests. The African conflict is an example; For personal interest, Africa’s leaders launch many brutal wars in Africa without minding victims. If leaders lose the ethical and moral standards, their countries are incapable of operating normally. In a word, leaders must maintain the highest moral and ethical standards in order to fulfill their responsibility.
Secondly, leaders holding the highest moral and ethical standards will facilitate development of country well, since they plan the country’s development in the long run. In the process of planning project, they consider the overall situation, because the leaders having high ethical and moral standards indicates they can consider other’s feeling. For example, Obama, who has no negative evaluation, is a greatness leader; In his presidency, he addressed the global financial crisis and included a major stimulus package, including legislation to reform health care and a major financial regulation reform bill, and the end of a major US military presence In Iraq. In sum, leaders who the highest moral and ethical standards can make country stable developing.
On the other hand, considering from a short-term, moral and ethical standards is the basis that people select a leader, and is the premise of being a leader. In the election, voters evaluate the candidates’ ability based on candidates’ ethical and moral standards. If candidates lose the baseline of the moral and ethical standards, they will lose the probability of becoming a leader. Hillary Clinton email controversy is an example; This bad news from Clinton had decreased average lead in the polls. As a result, she loses the probability of becoming a leader. In brief, moral and ethical standards is the base that voters select a leader.
To sum up, first of all, leaders must hold the highest moral and ethical standards, because they have social responsibility. Then, leaders having high moral and ethical standards will make country developing well in the long run, Finally, moral and ethical standards is the foundation that voters select a leader. With these reasonings, I totally agree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | nipuntestbig | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | ajay@123 | 62 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | idris oriyomi | 54 | view |
- You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group Do you think a person s honest is the most important characteristic for being a leader 70
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, in brief, as a result, first of all, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2388.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39051918736 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7461310746 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455981941309 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.663230214 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.15 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288949079405 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117650938687 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806443891281 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201993395899 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673682854845 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.