The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
I agree with the statement that the best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people they lead.
A leader is only as good as the team which he ultimately leads. If the team that he is leading is not happy or satisfied him then there is a very small chance of them succeeding in their endeavours. It is the duty of the leader to make sure that the morale within the team is high. Man management is one of the most important job that falls under his purview. It is his duty to ensure that their is no internal dissent within the team members; which will only cause to be a hindrance to their objectives. For a leader to be succesful, the team needs to have far more than just a modicum of trust in him. No person can be omnipresent, therefore without the help of the team itself, the leader is nothing but a glorified paper pusher. To do well in real life, a person is required to consider various approaches to any problem. If more people are involved in the decision making process, it is possible to cover more ground in a quick fashion, with regards to discussing the pros and cons of various courses of action. This also allows the team members to feel that their voices are not disregarded and leads to more productivity and transparency in the decision making process. In the real world, it can be clearly seen that democratic systems, even though they are not without their own cons, are far more popular than autocratic systems.
But it can also be argued that feedback from a lot of people can cause confusion in the mind of the person leadig them, as in a lot of cases, it is quite difficult to reach a consensus within the team itself, which can lead to the formation of factions within the group itself which is not good for the unity of the team. It is not good to take feedback on every single decision as well because it can cause the heirarchical structure of the team to fail. With some of the louder and arrogant members thinking that the the current leader is weak since he can't take a decision without the team backing him. A strong leader would have to take decisions unilaterally which might not be so popular but will ultimately be beneficial for the team.
Therefore, it is very important for a leader to always consider the feedback of the people that he is leading and then take a final decision to have the most productive and beneficial output for the entire team.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | sn140 | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | zzk81 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Aishwarya Jadhav | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | ryuha | 66 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 54
- tpo 8 the Chevalier 80
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of w 55
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 65
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... purview. It is his duty to ensure that their is no internal dissent within the team ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 923, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a quick fashion" with adverb for "quick"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ss, it is possible to cover more ground in a quick fashion, with regards to discussing the pros an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 462, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cal structure of the team to fail. With some of the louder and arrogant members thinking th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 516, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...uder and arrogant members thinking that the the current leader is weak since he cant ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 516, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...uder and arrogant members thinking that the the current leader is weak since he cant ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 556, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the the current leader is weak since he cant take a decision without the team backin...
^^^^
Line 9, column 556, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cants'.
Suggestion: cants
...the the current leader is weak since he cant take a decision without the team backin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47511312217 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44606863685 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438914027149 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3134888992 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.352941176 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35294117647 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21155999115 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083553788478 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163477364583 0.0758088955206 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260272773971 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.268728832077 0.0667264976115 403% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.