Leaders are responsible singlehandedly for the rise or fall of their nations. There are many types of leader's in this world while some prefer being called the greatest other's are called the greatest by their people. What seperates a self-proclaimed great leader from a leader that is called greatest by the public is their keeness for feedback from people. The prompt here agrees to the same in its recommendation that leaders who value feedback from their subjects are the best. Indoubtedly, the recommendation is jusitifed in its assertion because of the reasons that are as discussed below.
To begin with, it is the people who define who is the best leader to lead them not the other way around, of course unless it is an autocracy. People from any time may it be the ancient period or modern times have always found that the leaders those who listened to the concerns of the people were best for them. On the other hand, in any given time period leaders who aserted themselves to be the best for their people were regarded as brute's. Thus, it is clear that seeking public feedback is necessary for any leader to rise in the eye's of the public. Taking the instance of ancient Grecce, Soliditus was claimed to be the best emporor up unitll 2000 B.C. , not because Soliditus had won the most battles or created the largest and most magnificient of monuments but because he would seek the counsel on matters not only from his ministers but also from the public. It was a common occurence during his reign that Soliditus would go out of his palace to seek feedback on his rule and policies directly from the public.
Secondly, it is without a doubt that continous and incremental progress that triumphs challenges is mandatory in any field to for progress in any domain be it education, science or public governance. In regard to public governance, the policies that are formulated on public feedback and policy maker's who value public feedback in matter's of governance are regarded as the best. We have many historical examples to support our assertion. There was time when the world was ruled by monarchs and they had their way with the people with their policies as objecting emperor was seen as treason. These Monarchs would usually spend their finances on construction of palaces rather than addressing public matter's, many such empires ultimately crumbled under the weight of their own debt and these rulers were regarded as oppressors of the People. Ultimately people were fed up with this system of rule and a series of revolutions started all over the world in various republics and finally monarchs were replaced in favor of democratic rule. Democracy since its inception has been called the best from of governance because it gives space for public feedback.
In conclusion we can say that seeking feedback from public is neccessary for any leader to be called great.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagr 66
- Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Others believe that universities should not force students to take any courses other than those that will help pr 83
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 62
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'called the greatest'.
Suggestion: called the greatest
...imed great leader from a leader that is called greatest by the public is their keeness for feed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s who value feedback from their subjects are the best. Indoubtedly, the recommend...
^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to be the best emporor up unitll 2000 B.C. , not because Soliditus had won the...
^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...be the best emporor up unitll 2000 B.C. , not because Soliditus had won the most ...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dback and policy makers who value public feedback in matters of governance are re...
^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pport our assertion. There was time when the world was ruled by monarchs and they...
^^
Line 5, column 1158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use it gives space for public feedback. In conclusion we can say that seeking fe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, of course, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86788617886 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57557613034 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459349593496 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7046160604 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.052631579 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8947368421 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298860916686 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103141953514 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893563269005 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189730523532 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743806776085 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.