The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Feedback is an important thing in any undertaking, It allows people to see their work from the point of view of people arround them. In leaders it becomes particularly important, and helps them lead more effectively.
Leaders often don't see the world from the point of view of the people they lead, and since an understanding of the situation on the ground is important, a leader has to rely on feedback. Of coarse there are numerous statistical approaches that can also give a leader information on the current situations, but they don't always contain all the information needed, a more direct interaction between the leader and the people he leads can give a better understanding. Say for example a country has a problem with unemployment, the scale of the problem can be estimated from the aggregate data, but in order to find efficient solutions, it's also useful to understand what the people affected are doing now and what are they trying to do. Are they actively looking for a job? Are they rethinking career choices? Those are questions that are hard to answer by looking at the statistics.
Feedback is also helpful for achieving a better attitude towards the system people are dealing with. If people understand that their leaders reachable, they get a feeling that they are all working together towards a mutual goal. Instead of having the impression that they are thoughtless drones toiling away at their leaders behest, they instead get a feeling of belonging which strengthens their cooperation. Imagine a small company, if the boss is a distant figure that the employees interact with only via commands, they are likely not going to care very much whether the company succeeds or fails, if on the other hand they have at least a little say on the direction the company takes, they will get a sense of belonging and will have some stake in the companies success.
Indeed, the best leaders are the ones who encourage feedback, because it is a great source of information and critical for bolstering a spirit of cooperation.
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 75
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum:"Because the future will be dominated by technology, we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students. If our s 63
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ad more effectively. Leaders often dont see the world from the point of view of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ion on the current situations, but they dont always contain all the information need...
^^^^
Line 9, column 759, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...longing and will have some stake in the companies success. Indeed, the best leaders ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, as to, at least, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93063583815 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74804277913 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.5040195567 60.3974514979 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.230769231 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6153846154 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388698743362 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129634368178 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692295420066 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222505911461 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431407007461 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.