The best methodology to learn new traditions of the modern world is by observing the youngsters
For any person keeping up with future generations with time is most significant in maintaining a bridge between them. The older generation has to learn new traditions from the younger generation. Another way is to work it out on the internet and learn from it. But there is a limit to what a person can absorb from virtual situations. So it is highly recommended that one should go out and interact with younger generation to know their thinking process and how they react to a certain situation.
The younger generation as they grow develop new ideas and day to day activities from their friends and near around age group people. So for youngsters it is easy to learn and stay up to date with the fashion and technology. But this cannot be said same for the people from older generation. The cardinal obstacle is the ego factor that comes between learning from the youngsters. This could be a major reason for not asserting to the above issue. Also one has to select a correct role model is observing as there is a high possibility that the youngster is following outdated traditions which are not warmly accepted in the modern society.
On the other hand, as the modern society progresses forward it leaves the outdated people behind. So more and more effort is required to be put in by them. Now the easiest way possible for this is observing someone who is adept in it. For example in their adolescent ages, the kids learn from their parents the ways of life and world. But as they grow two things happen. The kids acquire more knowledge, and the parents become less attentive to the happening and breakthroughs of the world. So the tables turn and now the youngsters need to teach their parents about staying together with the world. This goes on as there was a time when the now parents taught their parents about that time, and there will come a time when these youngsters will grow old and will need to learn from the next generation.
So this is a cycle which will go on until there is a state of omniscience in all. Till then to keep up with the timely tradition one has to observe and learn from the younger generation and this is not only restricted to generation gaps the now young people also need to keep aside their ego and learn from their prodigal disciples.
- People who are most deeply connected to an idea or a policy are the most critical of it. 50
- With the development of simulation technology, should live experimentation on animals be considered not necessary any more? 50
- Practicing politics by consensus and identification of commonalities is better than considering the objective of politics to be the pursuance of ideals 58
- When someone achieves greatness in any field—such as the arts, science, politics, or business—that person’s achievements are more important than any of his or her personal faults 62
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n for not asserting to the above issue. Also one has to select a correct role model ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57946210269 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46579653615 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464547677262 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.5340187807 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1904761905 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4761904762 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95238095238 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192809427853 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578328523396 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617250883718 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12272425885 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343974479484 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.