Argument is an small type of paragraph wrote by someone, who provides his own opinion regarding a fact, event or situation.
Argument writers provides support or make assumptions for his own opinion. They should provide appropriate example which provides mounting as their argument. Their argument may also be based on some assumptions which may be correct or not to backing their argument. Their arguments propriety depends on how they strongly support their opinion through example or assumption by convincing someone.
On the contrast, the statement tell that argument's ability only depends on to convince someone with opposing viewpoint. But, argument's ability depends on mainly backing up arguments exactness not on opposing viewpoint. Convincing someone with opposing viewpoint may provide a case to support the arguments. However, arguments capability depends on mainly in which manner one can establish his opinion through positive or opposite viewpoint.
To test the argument capability one should check if the example or assumptions provide by argument writer is strong enough or not to prove his argument. For instance, one argument is 'Kapil will pass if he reads all the book'. Here, in this argument Kapil pass or fail depends on reading all the books. But, the book list or which types of book he should read not mentioned. Which can not strongly support this argument.
In conclusion, therefore, to provide support or prove an arguments propriety one should use as case to convince with opposing viewpoint. Nonetheless, argument's appropriteness ability mainly depends on arguments vindication to support his own opinion.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- UK telephone calls, by category, 1995-2002 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisions where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Argument is an small type of paragraph wrote by someon...
^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng a fact, event or situation. Argument writers provides support or make assumpt...
^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...n the contrast, the statement tell that arguments ability only depends on to convince som...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...ts ability depends on mainly backing up arguments exactness not on opposing viewpoint. Co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvincing someone with opposing viewpoint may provide a case to support the argume...
^^
Line 6, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ads all the book. Here, in this argument Kapil pass or fail depends on reading al...
^^
Line 6, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok list or which types of book he should read not mentioned. Which can not strong...
^^
Line 6, column 376, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of book he should read not mentioned. Which can not strongly support this argument....
^^^^^
Line 8, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...erefore, to provide support or prove an arguments propriety one should use as case to con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...ppropriteness ability mainly depends on arguments vindication to support his own opinion...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ness ability mainly depends on arguments vindication to support his own opinion.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 254.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47637795276 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8116218292 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 215.323595506 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452755905512 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 704.065955056 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.899610724 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.9375 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302212459533 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130212266851 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687305400546 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189015883208 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080617796396 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.